Discover more from dpl’s Newsletter
Mike Yeadon - Another Case of Lee Merritt?
Pay attention to his words.
In this post, I again want to highlight the importance of understanding why we know, for a fact, that no virus has ever been isolated. This is extremely important to understand, not just why we say it but also how easy it is to understand.
After that, we can jump into Yeadon’s story to show you what he has done in the past and what he is currently busy with. Below an appropriate quote for some of the content in this article.
It was theorized for the longest time that an infectious agent must be the cause of dis-ease and the drive to find a method by which this agent could be isolated became urgent during the end of the eighteen hundreds and the start of the nineteen hundreds. During this time, two people stood out, the first of which was Dmitry Ivanovsky, who claimed to have isolated the Tobacco Mosaic Virus (TMV) in 1892. The method by which this was done was already questionable, as he claimed that a filtered substance suspected of containing a virus could spread the virus when the substance was introduced to healthy plants. The healthy plants seemingly experienced dis-ease due to mechanical damage during the experiment rather than an infectious agent (see more here). This substance was subsequently placed under an electron microscope in 1939 and became the first "virus" to be visualized.
Virologists could not isolate a virus from a dis-eased person for more than 60 years after Ivanovsky’s claim of isolating TMV. However, in 1954, John F. Enders published a paper claiming that he isolated the measles virus from a sick person. The method by which he did so is even more ridiculous than that of Ivanovsky (refer to the step by step explanation in the virus lie article). During and after the years of Enders claiming isolation of a virus, scientists undertook two important types of studies to first of all establish whether dis-ease is transmittable and also to conduct control experiments to test the validity of the isolation method proposed by Enders. A summary of pathogenicity and control tests can be found in Virology: The Damning Evidence, which discusses six failed control studies and 19 studies failing to prove pathogenicity. The following is a summary of the history of virology.
Of everything discussed above, the most important point to focus on is the virus isolation procedure that Enders used in his study. This is the birth of virology as it currently stands, and with only some minor changes, this “isolation” process is nearly identical to what Enders used. When it comes to addressing the issue of NoVirus one should understand this method as well as the monumental flaws within it.
Here is a short summary of information that could get you up to speed on why this method of isolation, still being used today, is flawed:
First off, let's get an idea of the size of a virus by watching this video.
Once you have an understanding of the size of the particles being discussed, we can move on to the "isolation" method. It consists of two parts, "isolation" (part 1) and sequencing (part 2) of that which they claim is the virus. Information on this is as follows:
With "isolation" being the most important step, one must establish whether this procedure is valid or not. A control test is a logical step, as carried out by Enders himself in the 1954 paper. The control test, however, failed. The very first paper to ever claim the isolation of a virus causing dis-ease in man failed its control (explained here). Further peer-reviewed studies showing failed controls can be found here. Also see the excerpt from the Enders paper explaining the control failure, shown again below, because this is crucially important to understand. You do not have to hero worship anyone once you understand this. Also, everything that happens after this (isolation) is irrelevant because you do not know what you are dealing with.
Lastly, it has been repeatedly shown that all pathogenicity experiments carried out since 1901 have failed. The only experiments that managed to show signs of sickness include the ridiculous methods of filling the lungs of ferrets with excessive poisonous fluid and injecting the same sort of fluid in excessive amounts into the brains of monkeys (one example is explained here on ‘odysee’ or here on ‘bitchute’ or a more detailed post here).
In summary, this section places emphasis on how easy it is to understand that the "isolation" procedure is flawed. Even people who are not in the profession can see how blatantly fraudulent it is. It should be unbelievably easy for people in this profession to see this truth.
When it comes to Mike Yeadon, the most important information to review is probably the work that was done by Omar Jordan (Darkside papers) which can be found here. This report should, however, not be reviewed without considering Yeadon’s latest revelation, which is his admission that, and it is best we quote his words specifically "I don’t think there was a novel respiratory pathogen or respiratory infection". Again, like we have done with Lee Merritt, I think it is important that we keep a timeline of events when it comes to the flip-floppers of the plandemic hoax. It seems that Yeadon started making this admission around August 2022. What we can find on him is the following:
1 August 2022 - Yeadon’s first interview, where he started to doubt the existence of a respiratory infection, can be viewed here. His words were "there was never any new health threat whatsoever", and "I have come to the conclusion, and I will credit Andrew Cowan and his collogues, I had a really good chat with those guys early in 2020 and it bothered me, bothered me, bothered me. I realized, over time, I could no longer maintain my understanding of respiratory viruses as I thought I knew them and then I learned a new bit of information recently and it collapsed the possibility that respiratory viruses as described, exist at all, they don’t. People do get ill, people are ill, people have exactly the same illnesses as before that horrible Yeadon said, viruses don’t exist. They still have "colds" and "flu", it’s just, I think we don’t know what causes them but it is not respiratory viruses." (short video here). Notes from this interview are as follows:
One should not be fooled by the video snippet containing the information of Thomas Cowan and Andrew Kaufman, as this is not in the original interview (have a look from 14:00 minutes into the original interview). Yeadon makes reference to Andrew Cowan, but no such name exists in the NoVirus community that I am aware of. Not sure if this was deliberately wrong or a slip of the tongue, but people who do not know Tom and Andy won’t be able to search for their names based on Andrew Cowan...
Also, pay particular attention to Yeadon’s very meticulous word choice. Instead of placing focus on the fact that no virus has ever been isolated or discussing the flawed isolation process, he rather specifically refers to "no new respiratory viruses" or "new health threats".
Although there are some sentences and words he used in this interview that hint towards him thinking there is no virus this was not repeated in his interviews and articles that followed.
29 August 2022 - Yeadon features in a propaganda piece pushing preventative medicines with the blockbuster film producer Mikki Willis, who has been discussed in detail in the GatekeeperClub article. A more recent update on Mikki Willis can be found in our telegram group here. Notes from this piece:
Some of the biggest pushers of preventative medicines are Joe Rogan, Paul Marik, Rober Malone, Pieter McCullough, and Steven Kirsch. Someone doubting the existence of viruses who has done the required research on what causes dis-ease does not push petrochemical-based poisons, even less so with people who are well known for their propaganda pieces.
18 March 2023 - Yeadon’s second interview on GigaohmBiological expressing doubt in the virus theory, can be viewed here. His words were "excepting for the moment the viral model of transmission and I am having serious wobbles about this" and "I don’t know what I know anymore" and "I don’t believe there was… I don’t think there was a novel respiratory pathogen, respiratory infection". Notes from this interview are as follows:
Again, it is obvious that the wording used is very meticulous, with the focus on there being "no novel respiratory pathogen".
The rest of the interview seems to revolve around the difficulty of isolating viruses, and Yeadon even goes so far as to say that a spike protein could harm you biologically (at the 56 minute mark).
There is no discussion around the flawed isolation procedures that have been used since the 1954s to isolate viruses. Which is the most important point to focus on and the reason it was highlighted again at the start of this article.
22 March 2023 - Yeadon wrote an article titled: Why I don’t believe there ever was a Covid virus. Notes from this article:
First off, and this is the focus of this article, is how easy it is to realize the truth that no virus has ever been isolated. Seeing a lack of this in Yeadon’s message in the two interviews discussed above, one would think that if Yeadon could have some time to gather his thoughts and pen them down in an article, you would see clearly that he grasps this and also conveys the message, but based on all his statements, this is not the case. Again in this article we can take note of his very meticulous wording, which is "no novel virus", "no novel respiratory virus" and "novel pathogen". Please look up the definition of novel virus. It only means "a virus that hasn't been found in humans in the past". Meaning a new virus, and does not touch on the subject of all the viruses in the past or even less the most important topic discussing the flawed isolation process. This message has been so successfully pushed by Yeadon that I can talk to people in our community who would sight his words, thinking that Yeadon believes no viruses exist.
In this article, instead of laying out the basic truth of the isolation of viruses, Yeadon takes the opportunity to promote some of the instrumental gatekeepers in this space, which are Sasha Latypova and the cornerstone of their future plans, RFK jr. Both of them were discussed in detail in the GatekeeperClub article.
He also mentions that the new Covid vaccine would probably never have passed the usual vaccine quality requirements, which is not something someone doubting the existence of viruses would say. If there is no virus then no vaccine makes any senses because vaccines are based on the concept that you inject a weaker form of a virus into the body to train the body to deal with it.
And near the conclusion of the article is his current stance and admission without admitting it (if we can say it like that). He states, "But, whatever Covid actually is, I don’t believe that what was called influenza disappeared conveniently in early 2020. It’s another lie". Exactly what he has been saying in all his interviews and now this article. It was never a novel ("NEW") respiratory infection but rather one we are all familiar with.
Yeadon’s Past Dealings
Lately, a good article has also surfaced about Yeadon’s dealings at Pfizer, which is authored by John LaMattina, in which he brings praise to Yeadon, stating that:
"Mike and his team pulled off an amazing feat. They had a strong belief that the drugs that emanated from their Pfizer research work had value. But, converting that belief into reality was difficult". The full article here.
Michael Yeadon is seemingly also linked to Liberty Places who reportedly set up plans to build a luxury resort exclusive to anti-vaxxers on the tropical island of Zanzibar, off the coast of Tanzania (this article can be reviewed here) and more information on this can be reviewed here and here. Some highlights from these sources as follows:
“Yeadon claims to have no conflicts of interest and nothing to gain. He is fabulously wealthy from the sale of Ziarco. But he’s already using that money to influence politics. During an interview on Steve Bannon’s podcast War Room, Yeadon said that he planned to be spending a lot on supporting “U.S. politicians and influencers” over the next six months. He also has established (or at least endorsed) an initiative in the U.K., “Liberal Spring,” to remake the Lib Dems party into a sort of anti-vaccine-passport party. Finally, and perhaps more remarkably, he’s bought a parcel of land in Tanzania, which he plans to remake it into a sort of intentional community called “Liberty Places” for vax-less mask-less people.”
Again, I want to highlight to everyone that the truth of no virus is not difficult once you understand the language. For people in this profession, it should be an unbelievably easy concept to grasp. We, however, think that it is difficult because we do not come from the same background and have to study the material for at least a few weeks before we start to make sense of the studies and terminology. Yeadon’s lack of expressing this truth, even after having spoken to Cowan as far back as 2020 (by his own admission) is very difficult to comprehend.
Also consider the fact that the first time that Yeadon hinted at doubting the virus theory (which is not actually what he said if you consider his words) was 1 August 2022 and even after or during this time he still joined the blockbuster film producer Mikki Willi in producing a propaganda piece on Ivermectin. Something that is not acceptable when you are going through the revelation that viruses do not exist.
Two additional notes can be added to this article as follows:
It does seem that Yeadon has been talking to Thomas Cowan at least and although not clearly stated Cowan hints towards this in a tweet that can be seen here. This should however not distract from the fact that he is vague in his statements. In fact this should bring even more concern as to why he cannot reach the correct conclusion.
Michael Yeadon is also a signatory on the Settling The Virus Debate by Sam Bailey and again this should not distract from the fact that he is vague in his statements.
In conclusion we can leave Mike Yeadon with the below quote from Dr Tilden which ties in with the quote we started out with in the introduction.
Thanks for reading dpl’s Newsletter! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.