I am a nurse at the hospital and I have to say I wish I would have found you sooner. I have been trying to fight the medical tyranny of jabs, masks, and social distancing since the start of the scamdemic!! Thank you for all your great research. I’m new to the whole no virus platform but just curious how at the hospital they test people for RSV, Covid and Flu A&B? I had a patient who was sick the other day and she tested positive for Flu A. How can they say they differentiate this viruses when they don’t exist?
We have a whole team working on this answer. For the time being it is very easy to see that it is not a virus but there may be some chemistry trick they play to get the positive results. The reason I am so confident to conclude that it is not a virus is mostly documented here - https://dpl003.substack.com/p/virology-the-damning-evidence
On the testing fraud you will see that my most recent articles lay the foundation to investigate why they get the results they get. We intend to do a lot more research on that this year.
I have read the above substack. I loved it. I just happened to come across Daniel Roytas on Facebook one day and I’ve been delving into a bunch of his podcasts lately. He and the Bailey’s have me questioning why I still work at the hospital some days. I pray about and believe God has me there to open people’s eyes. Most people don’t listen and think I’m crazy but I don’t care . I press on. I’ve watched “The End of Virology” numerous times and it really blows my mind the pseudoscience of it all. The whole way you and others show how they isolate a virus just cracks me up. I’ve done some mourning after following your substack. I was a huge follower of Steve Kirsch, Doctor McCullough, Kory, etc and now I find it hard to believe anyone. It makes me sad. I’ve been a nurse for close to 30 years and feel like it has been a scam. I think of all the things I did during my career that I just never even questioned!! Covid woke me up!! I can’t tell you how upset I am that I walked around for three year wearing a stupid face muzzle. I will never do that ever again. Keep up all your great work and research.
Thanks Carlee, we can only ever do our best. If ever you want to have a conversation with like minded people join the Darkside Papers telegram group and start a conversation there. There's some great chaps in that group 😊
dpl, I just went to Darkside Papers in telegram and they told me I was banned by an admin. I have no clue why I would be banned. I don't remember ever leaving a comment in their group. I literally am looking for answers to refute doctors and administrators at work. I'm an open book and I'm not out to get anyone just looking for truth and answers. Mainly, how they come up with a positive test result when doing a swab that can differentiate between RSV, covd, and flu A&B.
I realize I am not as good of a speaker as is Jamie, but I am grateful for the opportunity to contribute.
Thanks for posting so quickly, DPL. I also wanted to say I think I understand your point about beginning with transmission. I think what you were saying is that basically disproving CONTAGION hypothesis.
If we have NO EVIDENCE of contagion anywhere in 150 years of scientific literature, i.e., proof that a sick person can make healthy people sick, simply by exposure by close proximity, breath, sneezing/coughing, touch, or exchange of bodily fluids, then CERTAINLY we don't need to try to isolate any particles or pathogens of any kind.
This is an example where we can have two truths simultaneously, both being correct, despite that this may seem contradictory:
1: We must BEGIN with "virus isolation" before we describe the properties of any particular virus.
2: There is no reason to discuss "virus isolation" if we have no evidence that Contagion is a legitimate model of disease transmission.
Agreed, Amy was really good with moderating. I really enjoyed this space and I enjoyed your contributions in this space also Bill.
On your point about contagion, first off, I am coming from an angle of trying to reach more people on the topic. I explained it more during one of the spaces here - https://www.bitchute.com/video/mdGsU2FxGIf6/
In terms of trying to place it in a logic tree I explained it using a presentation that Cowan gave on Inventive vs Inductive reasoning (see below link). The reason I suggest we focus on contagion is not just to make it easier for people who don't know the terminology but also because this was the original hypotheses stemming from an observation. If this hypotheses cannot be proven then all other inventive theories stemming from it is irrelevant. I broke this down in an article here - https://dpl003.substack.com/p/hacking-at-the-root-of-the-virus
I would even argue that "virus isolation" is inventive reasoning that is an unproven hypotheses stemming from the first (an epicycle). [We assumed that there is a small particle that spreads from a sick person to make a health person sick]
Let me know what you think Bill. I have spent a considerable amount of time to try and make it easier for the wider audience. I do realize that terminology is crucial to explain this all better.
Why did Twitter suspend you I just saw Kristen W's post about it
Pretty sure I was mass reported by the trolls 😂🤣
Hi dol,
I am a nurse at the hospital and I have to say I wish I would have found you sooner. I have been trying to fight the medical tyranny of jabs, masks, and social distancing since the start of the scamdemic!! Thank you for all your great research. I’m new to the whole no virus platform but just curious how at the hospital they test people for RSV, Covid and Flu A&B? I had a patient who was sick the other day and she tested positive for Flu A. How can they say they differentiate this viruses when they don’t exist?
Hi Carlee,
We have a whole team working on this answer. For the time being it is very easy to see that it is not a virus but there may be some chemistry trick they play to get the positive results. The reason I am so confident to conclude that it is not a virus is mostly documented here - https://dpl003.substack.com/p/virology-the-damning-evidence
On the testing fraud you will see that my most recent articles lay the foundation to investigate why they get the results they get. We intend to do a lot more research on that this year.
I have read the above substack. I loved it. I just happened to come across Daniel Roytas on Facebook one day and I’ve been delving into a bunch of his podcasts lately. He and the Bailey’s have me questioning why I still work at the hospital some days. I pray about and believe God has me there to open people’s eyes. Most people don’t listen and think I’m crazy but I don’t care . I press on. I’ve watched “The End of Virology” numerous times and it really blows my mind the pseudoscience of it all. The whole way you and others show how they isolate a virus just cracks me up. I’ve done some mourning after following your substack. I was a huge follower of Steve Kirsch, Doctor McCullough, Kory, etc and now I find it hard to believe anyone. It makes me sad. I’ve been a nurse for close to 30 years and feel like it has been a scam. I think of all the things I did during my career that I just never even questioned!! Covid woke me up!! I can’t tell you how upset I am that I walked around for three year wearing a stupid face muzzle. I will never do that ever again. Keep up all your great work and research.
Thanks Carlee, we can only ever do our best. If ever you want to have a conversation with like minded people join the Darkside Papers telegram group and start a conversation there. There's some great chaps in that group 😊
dpl, I just went to Darkside Papers in telegram and they told me I was banned by an admin. I have no clue why I would be banned. I don't remember ever leaving a comment in their group. I literally am looking for answers to refute doctors and administrators at work. I'm an open book and I'm not out to get anyone just looking for truth and answers. Mainly, how they come up with a positive test result when doing a swab that can differentiate between RSV, covd, and flu A&B.
Great space! Amy did a good job moderating.
I realize I am not as good of a speaker as is Jamie, but I am grateful for the opportunity to contribute.
Thanks for posting so quickly, DPL. I also wanted to say I think I understand your point about beginning with transmission. I think what you were saying is that basically disproving CONTAGION hypothesis.
If we have NO EVIDENCE of contagion anywhere in 150 years of scientific literature, i.e., proof that a sick person can make healthy people sick, simply by exposure by close proximity, breath, sneezing/coughing, touch, or exchange of bodily fluids, then CERTAINLY we don't need to try to isolate any particles or pathogens of any kind.
This is an example where we can have two truths simultaneously, both being correct, despite that this may seem contradictory:
1: We must BEGIN with "virus isolation" before we describe the properties of any particular virus.
2: There is no reason to discuss "virus isolation" if we have no evidence that Contagion is a legitimate model of disease transmission.
Did I get this right, DPL?
Hi Bill,
Agreed, Amy was really good with moderating. I really enjoyed this space and I enjoyed your contributions in this space also Bill.
On your point about contagion, first off, I am coming from an angle of trying to reach more people on the topic. I explained it more during one of the spaces here - https://www.bitchute.com/video/mdGsU2FxGIf6/
In terms of trying to place it in a logic tree I explained it using a presentation that Cowan gave on Inventive vs Inductive reasoning (see below link). The reason I suggest we focus on contagion is not just to make it easier for people who don't know the terminology but also because this was the original hypotheses stemming from an observation. If this hypotheses cannot be proven then all other inventive theories stemming from it is irrelevant. I broke this down in an article here - https://dpl003.substack.com/p/hacking-at-the-root-of-the-virus
I would even argue that "virus isolation" is inventive reasoning that is an unproven hypotheses stemming from the first (an epicycle). [We assumed that there is a small particle that spreads from a sick person to make a health person sick]
Let me know what you think Bill. I have spent a considerable amount of time to try and make it easier for the wider audience. I do realize that terminology is crucial to explain this all better.
THE SUMMER OF DIED SUDDENLY. A man reluctantly takes the jab in order to see his mother in a nursing home. Share Turfseer’s new song far and wide. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/the-summer-of-died-suddenly