Good analysis, again. It's the same ole bs over and over and over again and few question it which is why they keep this up. Then they do the song and dance around direct questions. I'm not so much baffled as to why all of these people keep spouting the same easily provable nonsense as to why so many people just gobble it all up without doing any serious questioning and research of their own. Alternatively, Cown, Lanka, Bailey's, Kaufman, Stone, Massey, have done it all for them if they only would stop and think. Amazing.
Thank you, dpl, for continuing to bring this into the light. We know, of course, that no one will ever send a study showing what you and Cowan repeatedly ask for. It should be easy though, right?
But far too many that really need the info broken down never even see these substack articles and videos as they are glued to MSM info and the "health freedom" pretenders.
I tend to think we are making good progress and ppl like Malik ane Couey is forced to take action like this which kind of gives awaytheir game.
Pablo says he has confronted Malik in twitter spaces before and he mutes you and talks over you... Not someone that want debate... So I guess the BS he spews in this video is just for the show.
I have come to the point where I determine that Mr. Couey and people like him are just not clever enough to grasp the difference between having a physical proof of something and having NOT.
Can he give a definition of a THING called virus, then explain how this definition developed, then explain the method of applying this to the virus definition and then show the proof, please? Isn't it that simple? Where did he lose the plot?
If apart from a pcr test nothing else on this planet were able to show the existence of a cat, would Couey believe in the existence of some-thing like cats? Why should it be any different when it comes to fictional viruses? A virus is allegedly a thing, right? Then he should be able to show that THING and only that THING or shut up for heaven's sake. This is so annoying.
Did he really say that you prove the existence of contagious pathogens that you find via PCR by creating clones from synthetic materials? He completely ignores person-to-person transmission experiments and contact tracing failures. It's sad, because he is one of the more palatable "dissenters" and now he's mass producing content where he's completely dishonest about the "no virus" camp.
Malik seems sort of dumb (like he alludes to) and only interested in people who want to make content. He doesn't respect that people take this topic seriously.
I've seen Couey have Yeadon on his show... I guess that says all you need to know. I've also invited Yeadon and he just ignored me. I'm still puzzled as to why 🤣😂🤣🤣
I don't know Malik but I've heard Pablo talk of encounters with him... Both talk about wanting to debating the subject but from what I've heard it's completely the opposite.
And yes... PCR... Another indirect method of horse sht to feed his inventive theory that fairy dust make you sick.
I saw Couey's comment on Masseys attack on Children’s Health Defense. I would like to understand her reason for doing so. There was another person going after Couey. Was that you? What is your motivation? Does Jonathan Couey have a large platform? Do you think he gets boosted by the algorithms like the approved dissidents? Why not engage with him? He is not saying that you are wrong about viruses not being a primary cause of disease.
You are acnowledging that exosomes are a thing, at least Kaufman has? So why is there this aversion regarding clones?
You sound a lot like a clown mate. You accused me of being a gatekeeper and now you list a bunch of other people with no evidence to support your claim that I am a gatekeeper. Are you being serious here or are your trying to make a joke that I'm not catching?
The comments here are clearly misrepresenting everything that Jonathan Couey and Gigaohm Biological stands for. That is why I redirected your false claim about Couey being a gatekeeper back at you. In my previous comment I appealed to you in the hope that you might seek common ground.
United we stand. Divided we fall.
Why do you choose to be divisive and unelastic?
You chose to interpret it in the worst possible way.
Very funny when the guy on the right started waving his hand around while trying to think of a suitable CON-flation subject to add to his argument. It was a killer when he stated lying.
Funny none of them ever mention that there are over 3500 Corona Virus patents held in the US patent office some going back as far as 1975 I think?
As far as I comprehend patenting of anything, the rules are if it exists in nature you are not allowed to patent it. So if that is true how could a corona virus exist in the wild?
If anyone has more information on this topic regarding patenting and what you can an can not do please let me know for educational purposes. Thank you in advance.
I absolutely agree, but there are still unanswered questions. I adopted a mother cat with her 2 kittens. The mother developed cat flu a week later. After a few days one kitten got it too. The cat I already had was kept in another part of the house but one day he got into the kitchen, walked on the same floor as the mother cat, but got no closer to her than 4 feet away. After a few days he got cat flu too. He had never had any kind of illness before, had always been kept indoors, and well looked after.
I agree there are no viruses, but this kind of thing needs to be explained before most people will believe that.
I fully agree that infectious viruses haven't been shown to exist. But that doesn't mean "infectious" diseases don't exit. This link (which you've probably seen before) suggests that cellular EMF is a possible mechanism.
Yet, so many of us once believed the contagion theory since we were (most of us) raised that way, and still we have questioned and learned and continue to learn. I don't think it even takes character and curiosity I think it just takes letting yourself, or demanding of yourself, to live like a real human being, an original one. We can all break through and get back to that, we only need to want to and not tie being wrong to our sense of self worth.
Good analysis, again. It's the same ole bs over and over and over again and few question it which is why they keep this up. Then they do the song and dance around direct questions. I'm not so much baffled as to why all of these people keep spouting the same easily provable nonsense as to why so many people just gobble it all up without doing any serious questioning and research of their own. Alternatively, Cown, Lanka, Bailey's, Kaufman, Stone, Massey, have done it all for them if they only would stop and think. Amazing.
Thank you, dpl, for continuing to bring this into the light. We know, of course, that no one will ever send a study showing what you and Cowan repeatedly ask for. It should be easy though, right?
But far too many that really need the info broken down never even see these substack articles and videos as they are glued to MSM info and the "health freedom" pretenders.
I tend to think we are making good progress and ppl like Malik ane Couey is forced to take action like this which kind of gives awaytheir game.
Pablo says he has confronted Malik in twitter spaces before and he mutes you and talks over you... Not someone that want debate... So I guess the BS he spews in this video is just for the show.
Wow.
And Twitter suppresses your tweet ("no freedom of reach") if you include a substack link.
Jea Sanjoy
I don't even bother sharing substack links anymore. It's a complete waste of time
Have to type in code.....like igpay atlinlay....kids talking pig latin in the 50s..( :
I have come to the point where I determine that Mr. Couey and people like him are just not clever enough to grasp the difference between having a physical proof of something and having NOT.
Can he give a definition of a THING called virus, then explain how this definition developed, then explain the method of applying this to the virus definition and then show the proof, please? Isn't it that simple? Where did he lose the plot?
If apart from a pcr test nothing else on this planet were able to show the existence of a cat, would Couey believe in the existence of some-thing like cats? Why should it be any different when it comes to fictional viruses? A virus is allegedly a thing, right? Then he should be able to show that THING and only that THING or shut up for heaven's sake. This is so annoying.
Agree mate. We need to call out these people so others can see what they are up to.
And he has the nerve to say no virus people are lying...
Did he really say that you prove the existence of contagious pathogens that you find via PCR by creating clones from synthetic materials? He completely ignores person-to-person transmission experiments and contact tracing failures. It's sad, because he is one of the more palatable "dissenters" and now he's mass producing content where he's completely dishonest about the "no virus" camp.
Malik seems sort of dumb (like he alludes to) and only interested in people who want to make content. He doesn't respect that people take this topic seriously.
I've seen Couey have Yeadon on his show... I guess that says all you need to know. I've also invited Yeadon and he just ignored me. I'm still puzzled as to why 🤣😂🤣🤣
I don't know Malik but I've heard Pablo talk of encounters with him... Both talk about wanting to debating the subject but from what I've heard it's completely the opposite.
And yes... PCR... Another indirect method of horse sht to feed his inventive theory that fairy dust make you sick.
The fairy dust got to Antarctica multiple times. Can't wait for the explanation.
"These people..."
Why do these two individuals who ostensibly have some degree of scientific traning not speak to any of the scientific aspects of the discussion?
Why are they so strident?
They did nothing but utilize ad hominems and strawmen. It was basic playground stuff.
I loved how Malik said "What about this nonsense, well it may be true..." when he referenced purification.
He showed his hand there.
Couey has never presneted a shred of concrete evidence for his aerosolized whatever theory. He's been pressed on this multiple times.
I think the only conclusion we can reach is that they need to be added to the gatekeeperclub.
The gatekeeper is you, making sure that nobody learns biology.
Care to elaborate?
I saw Couey's comment on Masseys attack on Children’s Health Defense. I would like to understand her reason for doing so. There was another person going after Couey. Was that you? What is your motivation? Does Jonathan Couey have a large platform? Do you think he gets boosted by the algorithms like the approved dissidents? Why not engage with him? He is not saying that you are wrong about viruses not being a primary cause of disease.
You are acnowledging that exosomes are a thing, at least Kaufman has? So why is there this aversion regarding clones?
https://rumble.com/v3zuate-2023-12-01-massey-and-holland-on-md4ce-1-dec-2023-brief-twitch1992700831.html
You sound a lot like a clown mate. You accused me of being a gatekeeper and now you list a bunch of other people with no evidence to support your claim that I am a gatekeeper. Are you being serious here or are your trying to make a joke that I'm not catching?
The comments here are clearly misrepresenting everything that Jonathan Couey and Gigaohm Biological stands for. That is why I redirected your false claim about Couey being a gatekeeper back at you. In my previous comment I appealed to you in the hope that you might seek common ground.
United we stand. Divided we fall.
Why do you choose to be divisive and unelastic?
You chose to interpret it in the worst possible way.
Are anyone's notification emails from SS for comments, etc., on this article by dpl coming from Proton Magic? All of mine are for some reason.
That's strange man. I've not seen anything unusual yet.
Very funny when the guy on the right started waving his hand around while trying to think of a suitable CON-flation subject to add to his argument. It was a killer when he stated lying.
Funny none of them ever mention that there are over 3500 Corona Virus patents held in the US patent office some going back as far as 1975 I think?
As far as I comprehend patenting of anything, the rules are if it exists in nature you are not allowed to patent it. So if that is true how could a corona virus exist in the wild?
If anyone has more information on this topic regarding patenting and what you can an can not do please let me know for educational purposes. Thank you in advance.
..just as a light humorous aside - doesn't couey sound like an overly worked, and stressed, kermit the frog?
I absolutely agree, but there are still unanswered questions. I adopted a mother cat with her 2 kittens. The mother developed cat flu a week later. After a few days one kitten got it too. The cat I already had was kept in another part of the house but one day he got into the kitchen, walked on the same floor as the mother cat, but got no closer to her than 4 feet away. After a few days he got cat flu too. He had never had any kind of illness before, had always been kept indoors, and well looked after.
I agree there are no viruses, but this kind of thing needs to be explained before most people will believe that.
Something on the kitchen floor?
I fully agree that infectious viruses haven't been shown to exist. But that doesn't mean "infectious" diseases don't exit. This link (which you've probably seen before) suggests that cellular EMF is a possible mechanism.
https://officialbrendanmurphy.substack.com/p/how-illness-actually-spreads
This seems plausible to me since we are electrical beings:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAN1qfEHeiA
Hi CK
That's why a specifically speak about transmission of a [[viral agent or particles]]
The body experiencing disease is not contested and the reason for disease is not discussed.
The first and biggest step in getting to a solution is to realize that it is not a virus.
Yet, so many of us once believed the contagion theory since we were (most of us) raised that way, and still we have questioned and learned and continue to learn. I don't think it even takes character and curiosity I think it just takes letting yourself, or demanding of yourself, to live like a real human being, an original one. We can all break through and get back to that, we only need to want to and not tie being wrong to our sense of self worth.