*Spoiler* It is just Proteins and basic chemical reactions.
Mullis was an actor hired to play a very specific role. He never stepped foot in a lab in his entire life and wasn't even part of the team who "invented" PCR. He's a fraud like the rest of them.
Wow, thank you so much for this, dpl and Jamie :)
I don't think Kary was a shill. His statements to me are scientific and cautious. As background, I led a team that unraveled the PCR fraud from 2020-2023. I will include our report at the end of this comment. He is known for demanding a paper that proved HIV caused AIDS. That was the right thing to do.
He said that to use the PCR diagnostically, that a gold standard must be met, and it's an impossible one. In his mind, attaining the gold standard meant being able to prove a pathogen is real, and show that it has effects, so that a threshold level can be found; and then the PCR can be a diagnostic tool -- reluctantly.
So he throws down a gauntlet that nobody can meet. We don't need him to say there is no virus. He said the right thing as a scientist: PROVE THAT THERE IS ONE, and that it has demonstrable effects. We don't need more than that. Even in 2020, people were far out on a limb asserting that there is no virus, and you make it sound like this is some kind of easy territory.
What is your personal history with belief in viruses? Where did you stand on 1/1/20?
Excellent post here. Based on what is reported in this medical science reveal, I'm never trusting government science any more.
The best take of the science behind the PCR test that I have read is by Tam in this article - https://criticalcheck.wordpress.com/2022/05/08/pcr-and-real-time-rt-pcr-under-critical-review/
Can't believe anyone thinks it's a valid test for anything.
Hmmmm. So you’re saying that only proteins definitely exist, but nucleotides -- defined as “any of a group of compounds obtained by hydrolysis of nucleic acids, consisting of a purine or pyrimidine base linked to a sugar (ribose or deoxyribose), which in turn is esterified with phosphoric acid” -- are only assumed to exist. Is this correct?
If so, I ask “Well then, do nucleic acids exist? Do purine or pyrimidine bases exist? Do sugars exist? Does phosphoric acid exist?
What chemicals exist? What elements exist? What molecules exist? What compounds exist?”
Where does the demarcation between what exists and what doesn’t descend into absurdity?
> “Given this charge is constant... it must be to do with quantity and not molecular weight IMO?”
The force (flux) in an electric field is proportional to its cross-section in the field, thus the quantity of the material is irrelevant because the more quantity the more cross-section it occupies.
If nucleic acids don’t exist (and I’m not claiming that this is your position), then how are proteins synthesized during development of the embryo and the fetus? How do tissues become differentiated.
The entire tableau has a Leftist, casually dissolute "the West is morally devolving so let's have fun" ambiance. If our last two centuries had actual painters like the 19th had, it could be an oil painting titled "Three Jews Having Fun".
"The half-truth Nobel Prize (Shill alert) winner was lying, there is no Virus or DNA"
Is it possible he was sincerely mistaken, rather than lying (which means conscious intent to deceive)?