"A gatekeeper is someone spreading a different message than what they know to be the truth for a purpose not disclosed to the people that follow them."
I think it's more than that. A Gatekeeper's job is specifically to guard the gates (of something). They will engage in distraction, deflection, obfuscation, limited hangout, etc. etc. in order to SPECIFICALLY guard the gates of a certain subject.
When it comes to this I think you and I are much more on the same page but I tried to find some balance in this article because people keep on telling me that I push to far. That and the list is getting so long it's ridiculous (LOL). For me if someone is untruthful that's enough to write them off. We can't be wasting our time considering information from people that's cooking up BS but I like your description. I'll work it into that definition next time.
In a perfect, truthful world a gatekeeper is one who guards the innocent and guards the truth from those who destroy. I am glad I found this post. There are people on it who I am open to exploring. It has shocked me, and from a point of energetics, if they are deceiving us, then we need to be alert because some who you claim are harming give off no dark energy. It is completely masked. And if they can fool those of us who can read energy, it means that they are using highly advanced technology, which would suggest we are not dealing with humans or even non humans…when they are so dark that it cannot be perceived, it means trouble. I have Always seen Mike Yeadon as one to trust. No bad energy. Nothing emitting from him that causes doubt. However, I want the truth and I am thankful I came across this post because I need to ask my heart why we can’t perceive this threat. What are they, who are they and how do they mask their dark agenda?
I was having a similar discussion this week with friends about whether or not a particular individual was gatekeeping.
My own definition boils down to whether or not they are up front about permitted topics. If yes then they are not gatekeeping, but are instead defining conversational boundaries. This is perfectly reasonable. It sets clear expectations for guests and audience, and presents an honest choice for whether or not to participate.
Some people struggle with that.
Not being allowed to discuss a particular topic, or even being mocked for doing so. They may conflate their personal feelings about a topic with being gatekept.
There are good reasons not to discuss certain topics. Perhaps they put the platform at risk, or perhaps they are just a subjective waste of time, an intellectual time sink. It’s important to introspect and consider these possibilities instead of jumping to nefarious conclusions.
On gatekeepers themselves, they do serve a useful purpose.
Truth must be individually known. While it is certainly important to “tell the truth”, this alone won’t make it sink in for another. Each individual must **realise** the truth, which occurs via individual discernment. That skill is honed on the ‘battlefield’ of gatekeepers and liars, by learning to distinguish good from bad.
It’s less about learning from the nuggets of truth gatekeepers sprinkle into their cauldrons, and more about understanding their methods and sharpening one’s discernment claws in the process.
I have a bit more to say on the individuals themselves, but I’ll save that for a separate comment.
There are a lot of angles to consider in this space. For me it's more about pushing the boundary to where most find it a bit to far so that the balance can be restored. We allow to much BS based on emotion and not factual information but I do know that it is useless doing this if people start to find you ridiculous. Pushing to far will lose you your audience and then you have a dairy with no reach.
I think the more people tackle this the more we would be able to make an impact. In the intro of this article it is explained that they provide a wide variety mainly to capture the whole spectrum. We need to also consider this if we want to make a real impact.
That's one things I did not anticipate when I started writhing the gatekeeperclub article. It is the large number of people on the list!😂🤣
The idea with the Yeadon article and this one was to show people what to pay attention to. These gatekeepers IMO is mostly well trained and know exactly which words to use and how to manipulate information to get the outcome they are looking for and once you are shown what they do you will be able to apply it to anyone and point it out if they are not sincere.
Unfortunately I do not know Mike Donio but I'll try and get you some info on him. Do please post some links to his info. Also, I firstly need to work on some nams others have also shared 😁
I do not know what exactly is going on with him to be honest but I was not very happy with a lot of things stemming from my interaction with Henry Early.
And just BTW Mike Stone is one of the good ones. He is a champ! On Kaufman I've also not found anything of note.
Mike Donio, Jeremy Nell, and Simon Goddek => all have good standing in our group, but all were included in Vigilant Fox's list. Hmmm.
I asked Mike Donio about this, and his answer didn't impress me. It was along the lines of "I thought it would be good for clicks", which implies that he had foreknowledge of inclusion on that list. I asked for more details: no answer.
I don't really know Mike that well. He's been Cc'd on some long email threads, and he never engages in discussion.
I've been watching Vigilant Fox for some time, and I'm 95% convinced that VF is a CHD joint. I doubt that there is a single person behind the account. VF is so prolific, it seems like it must be a team.
There is probably nothing better to get to the truth then asking these direct questions. It is very telling what these people do if you are polite yet firm. Looks like the noobs completely crack and spill the beans like "Jerm" and "Man In America". I had a proper laugh at their melt downs (LOL).
But I think (and it is only me thinking here) that the ones that has been through this same humiliation in the past has learnt to keep their mouths shut.
I see VF has gained almost 100k followers in less that two weeks... It is insane how quickly they are growing. I have not chased down others on the list [YET] but it remains to be seen what sort of character they have. I must say that at the rate the names are being crossed off the list I don't have high hope for anyone...
Please do let me know if you get something on those that have good standing with your group bc I'd also like some clarity on the ones that are not as obvious (https://pasteboard.co/sbcS7nqjXqzY.png).
I'm wanting to do a big update to my VPAC list, based on a) the VF list of "approved people", and b) Simon Goddek's list of "COVID Heroes". There are a lot of new names there for me. It takes me some time to investigate each name for possible inclusion.
Unfortunately, (and I didn't anticipate this), but I need to come up with a way to indicate people that are on the "Good List" who become suspect. I hate this part of my mission, because the last thing I want to get accused of is "dividing the movement" or spreading FUD about any individuals.
I was hoping my biggest problem would be keeping up with the people on the VPAC list that must be removed, because they come to our side! I never imagined that there would be defectors. I'm very troubled by Jerm and Simon Goddek, because both enjoy high standing amongst (at least some) members of #TeamNoVirus IMHO.
I have seen your list and already shared it. Great work on that. I always like to include some detail on each but that is one massive undertaking because there are hoards of them! Impossible for only a few people to keep this updated!
Jerm was a big disappointment for me because he is from South Africa (SA), like me, but I always found it suspect that he wanted nothing to do with our group here in SA, even though we are a large group that has done a lot of work on a number of important topics (NoVirus the main one).
The people that jump in and out make it most difficult. Lee Merritt showed me how they do this in one of the first posts of wrote on substack (https://dpl003.substack.com/p/the-gatekeepers-club-taking-on-new). Yeadon was a bit easier after Merritt showed me their ways. I think once you have featured in the Mikki Willis blockbuster productions your can be written off and both of them are linked to Mikki. Yeadon featured in one of his propaganda pieces and Merritt tried her best to keep Mikovits relevant with a bullshit interview on how she and NoVirus is not that different.
Donio has been shilling for the mRNA in the jab, has now sat for a CHD interview, and he dodges questions left and right. He swings on the nutsack of David Rasnick and with the Vigilant Fox endorsement, I no longer trust the guy.
Excellent takedown and breakdown of some of these gatekeepers... I try to be mindful of the "controlled opposition" term, but one really does have to question the motives of some of these fence sitters.
A good friend told me to stay away from using the term CO but words to me seem to have a different meaning to others ppl. I actually speak Afrikaans. Here we call a spade a spade and no one thinks funny about it. The rest of the world seem to be very sensitive to what things are called 🤷♂️
Exactly… also, we are well aware that there is a difference between someone simply disagreeing or not thinking the same things. There is nothing wrong with that, as the world would be quite boring if we all thought the same thoughts. But when there is a money trail, links to globalist organizations, big pharma incentives, and a constant fence sitting, you EARNED the fucking CO badge
Do you not think that Germ vs Terrain is a derailment tactic? As both sides cannot be proven its a perfect, deceptive duality trap, Cowon & Kaufman are both shills
Not sure how I missed your comment but I do not believe the No Virus topic is a distraction. It is probably one of the most important topics that we can address. If the illusion of a virus is broken then we can focus on the subjects of what is really making us ill.
On the topic of Cowon & Kaufman being shills. It probably depends from what angle you approach the problem. If we consider that there are masses of people that still need a clear message that there are no viruses I'd say they are doing a sterling job but for those of us that has seen it I do agree it can become repetitive and I do get your point but I won't call them shills. What bothers me the most is their magic potions and Cowan's logo (Mother of pearl) but I do not view a lot of their information anymore.
Magic potions? If you listened to Cowan regularly you would know why he carries the products he does and he never ever pushes them. He interviews many of the small business people, often just a single person, that carefully makes some of these products, and he personally uses many regularly. As well, if and when he learns new information that he can verify that may indicate something is not a healthy choice he will no longer offer or recommend that.
By all means my man. If buying something that you believe will make you happy for a price of up to $2000 dollars then don't let me stop you but I will not endorse it.
My only advice to ppl is to clean up their lives and if they need a remedy to do a water fast. If ppl eat the right foods the body has more than enough to cure itself.
Not sure what you are speaking about for $2000, perhaps the light boxes? Those things are for people that are either living in environments that have little sunshine, are housebound, and the like. For instance, my elderly mother that I was caring for hadn't been outside in 4 years, was unable to. Even an incandescent infrared light would have been beneficial but I didn't have one then. Not everyone is in the same environment nor starting out in the same condition and sometimes extra help is necessary.
I was talking about the lard products, plasma sea water for minerals, strophanthus , Salatin's meats, the carefully grown dehydrated pure vegetable powders, and the like. Many people, my area included, do not have access year around, (or even many foods in any season), to healthy whole fresh foods. Eating seasonally is always advisable, and that limits the variety immensely for some people. Cowan has never pushed any of these things but mentions them only if he thinks they will help someone in a certain situation and makes them available. I appreciate that.
We must be careful not to fall into the trap of "he/she sells products so I don't trust anything they say". I hear so many say that, I'm not saying that's what you are claiming, however. Sometimes a need is recognized and an honest caring person fills as much of that as possible while at the same time spreading the word of how to achieve good health as naturally as possible. Some people are so far past having just sunshine and good food return them to health that they need extra help, as in light sources. I think particularly of all those in long term care facilities. How much they would benefit from some of these things! I so would love to be able to help them in that regard.
I agree totally, and so does Cowan, that you need to eat real food, get sunshine fresh air and think good thoughts and the body absolutely will heal. He states this is almost every single video.
"A gatekeeper is someone spreading a different message than what they know to be the truth for a purpose not disclosed to the people that follow them."
I think it's more than that. A Gatekeeper's job is specifically to guard the gates (of something). They will engage in distraction, deflection, obfuscation, limited hangout, etc. etc. in order to SPECIFICALLY guard the gates of a certain subject.
Hi omarj
When it comes to this I think you and I are much more on the same page but I tried to find some balance in this article because people keep on telling me that I push to far. That and the list is getting so long it's ridiculous (LOL). For me if someone is untruthful that's enough to write them off. We can't be wasting our time considering information from people that's cooking up BS but I like your description. I'll work it into that definition next time.
That is satanic inversion…
In a perfect, truthful world a gatekeeper is one who guards the innocent and guards the truth from those who destroy. I am glad I found this post. There are people on it who I am open to exploring. It has shocked me, and from a point of energetics, if they are deceiving us, then we need to be alert because some who you claim are harming give off no dark energy. It is completely masked. And if they can fool those of us who can read energy, it means that they are using highly advanced technology, which would suggest we are not dealing with humans or even non humans…when they are so dark that it cannot be perceived, it means trouble. I have Always seen Mike Yeadon as one to trust. No bad energy. Nothing emitting from him that causes doubt. However, I want the truth and I am thankful I came across this post because I need to ask my heart why we can’t perceive this threat. What are they, who are they and how do they mask their dark agenda?
Nice definition of gatekeeper.
I was having a similar discussion this week with friends about whether or not a particular individual was gatekeeping.
My own definition boils down to whether or not they are up front about permitted topics. If yes then they are not gatekeeping, but are instead defining conversational boundaries. This is perfectly reasonable. It sets clear expectations for guests and audience, and presents an honest choice for whether or not to participate.
Some people struggle with that.
Not being allowed to discuss a particular topic, or even being mocked for doing so. They may conflate their personal feelings about a topic with being gatekept.
There are good reasons not to discuss certain topics. Perhaps they put the platform at risk, or perhaps they are just a subjective waste of time, an intellectual time sink. It’s important to introspect and consider these possibilities instead of jumping to nefarious conclusions.
On gatekeepers themselves, they do serve a useful purpose.
Truth must be individually known. While it is certainly important to “tell the truth”, this alone won’t make it sink in for another. Each individual must **realise** the truth, which occurs via individual discernment. That skill is honed on the ‘battlefield’ of gatekeepers and liars, by learning to distinguish good from bad.
It’s less about learning from the nuggets of truth gatekeepers sprinkle into their cauldrons, and more about understanding their methods and sharpening one’s discernment claws in the process.
I have a bit more to say on the individuals themselves, but I’ll save that for a separate comment.
Great comment dbuser,
There are a lot of angles to consider in this space. For me it's more about pushing the boundary to where most find it a bit to far so that the balance can be restored. We allow to much BS based on emotion and not factual information but I do know that it is useless doing this if people start to find you ridiculous. Pushing to far will lose you your audience and then you have a dairy with no reach.
I think the more people tackle this the more we would be able to make an impact. In the intro of this article it is explained that they provide a wide variety mainly to capture the whole spectrum. We need to also consider this if we want to make a real impact.
Mike Donio is on The Vigilant Fox's list. Thoughts?
Hi Rocky
That's one things I did not anticipate when I started writhing the gatekeeperclub article. It is the large number of people on the list!😂🤣
The idea with the Yeadon article and this one was to show people what to pay attention to. These gatekeepers IMO is mostly well trained and know exactly which words to use and how to manipulate information to get the outcome they are looking for and once you are shown what they do you will be able to apply it to anyone and point it out if they are not sincere.
Unfortunately I do not know Mike Donio but I'll try and get you some info on him. Do please post some links to his info. Also, I firstly need to work on some nams others have also shared 😁
Thanks for the reply :) Mike Donio has a Substack - https://stillinthestorm.substack.com/
He has collaborated with Dr Kaufman and possibly Mike Stone from ViroLIEgy, probably others as well.
Take care.
Hi Rocky,
I've asked our group about him and they seem to think he is one of the good ones ;-)
Hi Rocky,
Was scrolling through the comments and saw your comment again. Some feedback on Mike here - https://t.me/thegatekeeperclub/386
I do not know what exactly is going on with him to be honest but I was not very happy with a lot of things stemming from my interaction with Henry Early.
And just BTW Mike Stone is one of the good ones. He is a champ! On Kaufman I've also not found anything of note.
Mike Donio, Jeremy Nell, and Simon Goddek => all have good standing in our group, but all were included in Vigilant Fox's list. Hmmm.
I asked Mike Donio about this, and his answer didn't impress me. It was along the lines of "I thought it would be good for clicks", which implies that he had foreknowledge of inclusion on that list. I asked for more details: no answer.
I don't really know Mike that well. He's been Cc'd on some long email threads, and he never engages in discussion.
I've been watching Vigilant Fox for some time, and I'm 95% convinced that VF is a CHD joint. I doubt that there is a single person behind the account. VF is so prolific, it seems like it must be a team.
Hi Bill
There is probably nothing better to get to the truth then asking these direct questions. It is very telling what these people do if you are polite yet firm. Looks like the noobs completely crack and spill the beans like "Jerm" and "Man In America". I had a proper laugh at their melt downs (LOL).
But I think (and it is only me thinking here) that the ones that has been through this same humiliation in the past has learnt to keep their mouths shut.
I see VF has gained almost 100k followers in less that two weeks... It is insane how quickly they are growing. I have not chased down others on the list [YET] but it remains to be seen what sort of character they have. I must say that at the rate the names are being crossed off the list I don't have high hope for anyone...
Please do let me know if you get something on those that have good standing with your group bc I'd also like some clarity on the ones that are not as obvious (https://pasteboard.co/sbcS7nqjXqzY.png).
I'm wanting to do a big update to my VPAC list, based on a) the VF list of "approved people", and b) Simon Goddek's list of "COVID Heroes". There are a lot of new names there for me. It takes me some time to investigate each name for possible inclusion.
http://apocalypticyoga.wikidot.com/virus-pushers-against-clotshots
Unfortunately, (and I didn't anticipate this), but I need to come up with a way to indicate people that are on the "Good List" who become suspect. I hate this part of my mission, because the last thing I want to get accused of is "dividing the movement" or spreading FUD about any individuals.
I was hoping my biggest problem would be keeping up with the people on the VPAC list that must be removed, because they come to our side! I never imagined that there would be defectors. I'm very troubled by Jerm and Simon Goddek, because both enjoy high standing amongst (at least some) members of #TeamNoVirus IMHO.
I have seen your list and already shared it. Great work on that. I always like to include some detail on each but that is one massive undertaking because there are hoards of them! Impossible for only a few people to keep this updated!
Jerm was a big disappointment for me because he is from South Africa (SA), like me, but I always found it suspect that he wanted nothing to do with our group here in SA, even though we are a large group that has done a lot of work on a number of important topics (NoVirus the main one).
The people that jump in and out make it most difficult. Lee Merritt showed me how they do this in one of the first posts of wrote on substack (https://dpl003.substack.com/p/the-gatekeepers-club-taking-on-new). Yeadon was a bit easier after Merritt showed me their ways. I think once you have featured in the Mikki Willis blockbuster productions your can be written off and both of them are linked to Mikki. Yeadon featured in one of his propaganda pieces and Merritt tried her best to keep Mikovits relevant with a bullshit interview on how she and NoVirus is not that different.
The two lists I am working on now is the FV one you have and here is another stunning list by Kathleen Devanney (https://devanneykathleen.substack.com/p/red-pill-package-one). They make our work easy (LOL).
I also see Jerm is on a rampage as people are fed up with the BS - https://twitter.com/LouisRiel_Ghost/status/1645712859886919681?s=20
Donio has been shilling for the mRNA in the jab, has now sat for a CHD interview, and he dodges questions left and right. He swings on the nutsack of David Rasnick and with the Vigilant Fox endorsement, I no longer trust the guy.
Same here. I wrote him a fairly direct reply on twitter yesterday. Not happy AT ALL about what he is up to!
A good gatekeeper/controlled opp. exposing channel on YouTube (this episode is on Stew Peters): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XdHnpVpp2-g
Thanks for the link Tim
Excellent takedown and breakdown of some of these gatekeepers... I try to be mindful of the "controlled opposition" term, but one really does have to question the motives of some of these fence sitters.
A good friend told me to stay away from using the term CO but words to me seem to have a different meaning to others ppl. I actually speak Afrikaans. Here we call a spade a spade and no one thinks funny about it. The rest of the world seem to be very sensitive to what things are called 🤷♂️
Exactly… also, we are well aware that there is a difference between someone simply disagreeing or not thinking the same things. There is nothing wrong with that, as the world would be quite boring if we all thought the same thoughts. But when there is a money trail, links to globalist organizations, big pharma incentives, and a constant fence sitting, you EARNED the fucking CO badge
🎯🎯🎯
Do you not think that Germ vs Terrain is a derailment tactic? As both sides cannot be proven its a perfect, deceptive duality trap, Cowon & Kaufman are both shills
Hi UnderMind
Not sure how I missed your comment but I do not believe the No Virus topic is a distraction. It is probably one of the most important topics that we can address. If the illusion of a virus is broken then we can focus on the subjects of what is really making us ill.
On the topic of Cowon & Kaufman being shills. It probably depends from what angle you approach the problem. If we consider that there are masses of people that still need a clear message that there are no viruses I'd say they are doing a sterling job but for those of us that has seen it I do agree it can become repetitive and I do get your point but I won't call them shills. What bothers me the most is their magic potions and Cowan's logo (Mother of pearl) but I do not view a lot of their information anymore.
Magic potions? If you listened to Cowan regularly you would know why he carries the products he does and he never ever pushes them. He interviews many of the small business people, often just a single person, that carefully makes some of these products, and he personally uses many regularly. As well, if and when he learns new information that he can verify that may indicate something is not a healthy choice he will no longer offer or recommend that.
By all means my man. If buying something that you believe will make you happy for a price of up to $2000 dollars then don't let me stop you but I will not endorse it.
My only advice to ppl is to clean up their lives and if they need a remedy to do a water fast. If ppl eat the right foods the body has more than enough to cure itself.
Not sure what you are speaking about for $2000, perhaps the light boxes? Those things are for people that are either living in environments that have little sunshine, are housebound, and the like. For instance, my elderly mother that I was caring for hadn't been outside in 4 years, was unable to. Even an incandescent infrared light would have been beneficial but I didn't have one then. Not everyone is in the same environment nor starting out in the same condition and sometimes extra help is necessary.
I was talking about the lard products, plasma sea water for minerals, strophanthus , Salatin's meats, the carefully grown dehydrated pure vegetable powders, and the like. Many people, my area included, do not have access year around, (or even many foods in any season), to healthy whole fresh foods. Eating seasonally is always advisable, and that limits the variety immensely for some people. Cowan has never pushed any of these things but mentions them only if he thinks they will help someone in a certain situation and makes them available. I appreciate that.
We must be careful not to fall into the trap of "he/she sells products so I don't trust anything they say". I hear so many say that, I'm not saying that's what you are claiming, however. Sometimes a need is recognized and an honest caring person fills as much of that as possible while at the same time spreading the word of how to achieve good health as naturally as possible. Some people are so far past having just sunshine and good food return them to health that they need extra help, as in light sources. I think particularly of all those in long term care facilities. How much they would benefit from some of these things! I so would love to be able to help them in that regard.
I agree totally, and so does Cowan, that you need to eat real food, get sunshine fresh air and think good thoughts and the body absolutely will heal. He states this is almost every single video.
Hi Opinionist
Thank you for the kind words. I will chase you down on twitter :-)