“Viruses” cannot be shown to exist as defined, which in simple terms means a sub-microscopic protein-covered length of RNA or DNA that can infect a host, reproduce and subsequently be transmitted by the host’s own biological mechanisms to infect again.
It simply is not good enough to point to imagery of objects or sequences of RNA/DNA and declare “this is the virus” without showing, end to end, that it actually does everything they claim it can do.
The “isolation” process for viruses is completely different to that for other protein-sized substances, and involves contaminating the sample rather than purifying it; this in itself is utter madness, and a fine example of the backwards pseudoscientific thinking of virology.
This fact alone ought to be problematic enough, given that reliable techniques do exist to routinely isolate other proteins that closely resemble viruses in all but name.
The main reason why a radically different technique is used for viruses seems to be that pathogenicity experiments always fail otherwise.
In fact, viruses can only ever be shown to cause ‘pathogenic’ effects under the most contrived lab conditions imaginable, with the alleged natural transmission journey eliminated altogether, and usually by the virologist injecting the suspected pathogen (plus many other toxic substances) directly into the host’s tissues or onto a cell culture.
That’s the only way a virologist can experiment with a ‘virus’ and get the results he is looking for. Doing so in a scientific manner never works, because virology is pseudoscience (and really, anti-science).
Bypassing a host’s defenses by directly injecting toxic proteins and other substances will cause effects as consistently as the mixture and methodology can be produced. As virology gets better at manipulating these injected cocktails, the consistency of observations is used as further evidence that the alleged virus does all the same things in a natural setting too, without that crucial part ever being demonstrated.
So let’s take them out of their simulated world and hold their feet to the fire in reality, ask them to show pathogenicity in a natural setting, and contagion from sick to healthy hosts. Unless and until challenge experiments can be done scientifically, viruses remain a theoretical concept with a 100% failure rate in valid scientific experiments.
Fantastic post. This is exactly what I was looking for. I've heard about the 1918 flu trials and wanted to see some trials on common colds and other flues, but didn't know where to look. Thanks!
I can give you the results of my own trial as a teacher the past 11 years. I can be in a room everyday swarming with kids sneezing and coughing on me all day. 9 out of 10 times kids don't make me sick. When teachers start getting sick it is a little bit more of a concern, but there is still no solid transmission connection. Last year I sat at a table with a kid who was coughing and sneezing. He eventually sneezed right on my face and I felt the saliva hit me between the eyes. At the time, I had just begun accepting that germs don't really exist and are not transmissible so I was not too worried.
Great summary and great idea to put all the info in one place! I see you already have some references to Mike Stone's, ViroLIEgy, but really everything on that site is gold re the no virus debate. However, what you are missing is Dr Harold Hillman's work (unless I have missed a reference somewhere) because he was really a forerunner in pointing out a lot of issues in accepted science. In particular, Dr Hillman pointed out the complete lack of control experiments in almost all biochemistry experiments and then he did an enormous amount of work on the electron microscope and the failures of cytology, specifically that most of the structures in cells apparent by electron microscopy are artifacts. See his story and references to his work here >https://www.big-lies.org/harold-hillman-biology/what-price-intellectual-honesty.htm. Otherwise thank you for a your great work.
Unfortunately I married someone who studied 'virology' and believes in them because he 'worked with them'. I spend all night every night researching how 'viruses' are 'isolated'... he won't research a thing because he knows it all already. Ah well....
Thank you for this great write up and I'm happy to see more people speaking out about No Contagion / transmission of disease, so no virus.
'The only real virus is the believe that viruses exist' is how I phrase it now, after speaking for 2.5 years about 'no virus'. As ideas are real ideas.
Please have a look at the letter I recently wrote to the Dutch senators, who voted for the Dutch pandemic laws anyways...
I would like to congratulate you for your all your work. It is clear, precise and succinct. Once you know where to look, there is an abundance of information that conclusively demonstrates that virology is pseudoscience. Because there is so much information, it can overwhelm you. I was considering the monumental task of putting all those pieces together in a way that cuts to the chase. Fortunately, you beat me to it, so I am grateful for not only your work, but also saving me from having to compile all the relevant information. And you are right of course regarding "no virus", since once that concept is grasped, everything that follows can be disregarded and seen in reality for what it is.
As you have cited in the article above the study by Ben Killingley and stated that "Nobody got sick", I was wondering if you could explain this quote as on reading the paper, it does appear that a number of participants did exhibit what could be considered cold like symptoms.
Si certo d'accordo suL concetto della NON trasmissione CHE SIA IMPORTANTE, ma anche solamente i test PCR E I TAMPONI CHE DAVANO RISULTATI FRAUDOLENTI E INAFFIDABILI, ANCHE QUESTO HA CONTRIBUITO A LEGITTIMARE IN QUEL PERIODO LA TRASMISSIONE PER LA PSEUDOVIROLOGIA, ESSENDOSI POI ACCORTI DELLA GRANDE TRUFFA LI HANNO SOSPESI E RITIRATI COMLETAMENTE COME SINTOMI DI TRASMISSIONE O CONTAGIO, LA VIROLOGIA E I VIROLOGI SONO FALSA SCIENZA PERCHEì SOSTENGONO UN ERRORE DI FONDO DOVUTA ALLA CULTURA DELLA TEORIA...RIPETO TEORIA.. DEI GERMI , DOVE MICRO ORGANISMI INVISIBILI VENGONO ETICHETTATI COME AGENTI PATOGENI VIRALI CHE CAUSANO INFEZIONE E CONTAGIO, DA PASTEUR AD OGGI ANCORA LA PSEUDOVIROLOGIA SOSTIENE QUESTA IDIOZIA SOLO NELLA LORO TESTA, "CONFUTATA ", PIU' VOLTE IN QUESTO LASSO DI TEMPO, CI SONO ...O CI FANNNO ...!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You may want to read my following elaborate post. I cited you. But I have also been collecting data points on this sophistic virology deception topic for the past couple of years, which I just dumped publicly in the following Quora answer.
I loved this. Extremely eye-opening. Reminded me of Garett Kramer. I’m still stuck on one thing though.... herpes simplex. I don’t get cold sores on my lip anymore, and used to get them once a year (I’m hypothesizing that is because I’ve done several 30-day fasts and assume the autophagy killed the “virus” or removed it from my system). When I’d feel one surfacing, I would take the listed dose on an anti-viral medication (forget what it’s called but it’s standard prescription for cold sores. Zovirax? I don’t remember) and it would prevent the cold sore from surfacing into a large sore and keep it very small and only minorly noticeable. If a virus isn’t real, which may be true, then what is herpes simplex and how did the anti-viral medication work so successfully every time? When I was younger, I didn’t have that medication and the cold sores would become enormous. Herpes is very much contagious and can spread to others just from touch. This is hurting my brain! Can someone explain this?
Also, I noticed during my pregnancy that the only time I got a cold sore (it was 3rd trimester), my body suppressed it on its own without any use of medication. I would never use any kind of medication during pregnancy and apparently a pregnant woman’s immune system is weak (which I knew was probably bullshit and not true, and my body proved that it was in fact stronger during pregnancy). So my cold sore during pregnancy stayed soooo small and was gone within 2 days (very unusually short duration). After pregnancy I only got one more and it went away just as quickly without any prescription meds- all I used was an ointment containing emu oil, oregano oil, thyme oil, etc etc etc. just a dab. After lots or extended water fasts, my cold sores have never returned. It’s been nearly 3 years now.....
So what are cold sores if not viruses? Very confused and if anyone can shed some light I would be grateful to hear the discussion. Thanks.
I made a huge list of medical papers of which most of them are considered to be proof of pathogenicity, contagion etc. - including links to access them and PDFs (~600Mb).
I also have the complete paper by Schmitz 1920, the one by Williams et al. (1921)... I went through your list until 1949 (Polio and NY Health State Department) then I became lazy... sorry for that.
An exceptional article exploiting the true magic behind the show. Smoke and mirrors! I admire your commitment to this one particular topic that brings one of the largest house of cards down ever. There are no viruses, but there are infectious agents that won't be found as a virus. Man made illness via engineering, poisoning, and the encouragement of bad choices. Well done indeed.
Virology - The Damning Evidence
Very nice summary, thank you.
“Viruses” cannot be shown to exist as defined, which in simple terms means a sub-microscopic protein-covered length of RNA or DNA that can infect a host, reproduce and subsequently be transmitted by the host’s own biological mechanisms to infect again.
It simply is not good enough to point to imagery of objects or sequences of RNA/DNA and declare “this is the virus” without showing, end to end, that it actually does everything they claim it can do.
The “isolation” process for viruses is completely different to that for other protein-sized substances, and involves contaminating the sample rather than purifying it; this in itself is utter madness, and a fine example of the backwards pseudoscientific thinking of virology.
This fact alone ought to be problematic enough, given that reliable techniques do exist to routinely isolate other proteins that closely resemble viruses in all but name.
The main reason why a radically different technique is used for viruses seems to be that pathogenicity experiments always fail otherwise.
In fact, viruses can only ever be shown to cause ‘pathogenic’ effects under the most contrived lab conditions imaginable, with the alleged natural transmission journey eliminated altogether, and usually by the virologist injecting the suspected pathogen (plus many other toxic substances) directly into the host’s tissues or onto a cell culture.
That’s the only way a virologist can experiment with a ‘virus’ and get the results he is looking for. Doing so in a scientific manner never works, because virology is pseudoscience (and really, anti-science).
Bypassing a host’s defenses by directly injecting toxic proteins and other substances will cause effects as consistently as the mixture and methodology can be produced. As virology gets better at manipulating these injected cocktails, the consistency of observations is used as further evidence that the alleged virus does all the same things in a natural setting too, without that crucial part ever being demonstrated.
So let’s take them out of their simulated world and hold their feet to the fire in reality, ask them to show pathogenicity in a natural setting, and contagion from sick to healthy hosts. Unless and until challenge experiments can be done scientifically, viruses remain a theoretical concept with a 100% failure rate in valid scientific experiments.
Consensus......Con (the) sense (out of) us.
Fantastic post. This is exactly what I was looking for. I've heard about the 1918 flu trials and wanted to see some trials on common colds and other flues, but didn't know where to look. Thanks!
I can give you the results of my own trial as a teacher the past 11 years. I can be in a room everyday swarming with kids sneezing and coughing on me all day. 9 out of 10 times kids don't make me sick. When teachers start getting sick it is a little bit more of a concern, but there is still no solid transmission connection. Last year I sat at a table with a kid who was coughing and sneezing. He eventually sneezed right on my face and I felt the saliva hit me between the eyes. At the time, I had just begun accepting that germs don't really exist and are not transmissible so I was not too worried.
I never got a sniffle.
Great summary and great idea to put all the info in one place! I see you already have some references to Mike Stone's, ViroLIEgy, but really everything on that site is gold re the no virus debate. However, what you are missing is Dr Harold Hillman's work (unless I have missed a reference somewhere) because he was really a forerunner in pointing out a lot of issues in accepted science. In particular, Dr Hillman pointed out the complete lack of control experiments in almost all biochemistry experiments and then he did an enormous amount of work on the electron microscope and the failures of cytology, specifically that most of the structures in cells apparent by electron microscopy are artifacts. See his story and references to his work here >https://www.big-lies.org/harold-hillman-biology/what-price-intellectual-honesty.htm. Otherwise thank you for a your great work.
Unfortunately I married someone who studied 'virology' and believes in them because he 'worked with them'. I spend all night every night researching how 'viruses' are 'isolated'... he won't research a thing because he knows it all already. Ah well....
Thank you for this great write up and I'm happy to see more people speaking out about No Contagion / transmission of disease, so no virus.
'The only real virus is the believe that viruses exist' is how I phrase it now, after speaking for 2.5 years about 'no virus'. As ideas are real ideas.
Please have a look at the letter I recently wrote to the Dutch senators, who voted for the Dutch pandemic laws anyways...
https://telegra.ph/Youve-been-lied-to-by-experts-who-dont-know-any-better--the-hard-virus-truth-05-20
There are some nice additions like:
- "No one has claimed the €1,500,000 bid with evidence for the existence of a coronavirus: https://samueleckert.net/isolate-truth-fund/"
- The effectiveness of ‘vaccines’ in 1 image.
- Louis Pasteur, the Father of immunology, admitted his fraud
- https://drsambailey.com/a-farewell-to-virology-expert-edition
Dr. Sam Bailey is also author of the book Virus Mania and made many excellent video's.
I will add a link to this substack and some more to it soon. Already shared on my Telegram channel.
I would like to congratulate you for your all your work. It is clear, precise and succinct. Once you know where to look, there is an abundance of information that conclusively demonstrates that virology is pseudoscience. Because there is so much information, it can overwhelm you. I was considering the monumental task of putting all those pieces together in a way that cuts to the chase. Fortunately, you beat me to it, so I am grateful for not only your work, but also saving me from having to compile all the relevant information. And you are right of course regarding "no virus", since once that concept is grasped, everything that follows can be disregarded and seen in reality for what it is.
As you have cited in the article above the study by Ben Killingley and stated that "Nobody got sick", I was wondering if you could explain this quote as on reading the paper, it does appear that a number of participants did exhibit what could be considered cold like symptoms.
Si certo d'accordo suL concetto della NON trasmissione CHE SIA IMPORTANTE, ma anche solamente i test PCR E I TAMPONI CHE DAVANO RISULTATI FRAUDOLENTI E INAFFIDABILI, ANCHE QUESTO HA CONTRIBUITO A LEGITTIMARE IN QUEL PERIODO LA TRASMISSIONE PER LA PSEUDOVIROLOGIA, ESSENDOSI POI ACCORTI DELLA GRANDE TRUFFA LI HANNO SOSPESI E RITIRATI COMLETAMENTE COME SINTOMI DI TRASMISSIONE O CONTAGIO, LA VIROLOGIA E I VIROLOGI SONO FALSA SCIENZA PERCHEì SOSTENGONO UN ERRORE DI FONDO DOVUTA ALLA CULTURA DELLA TEORIA...RIPETO TEORIA.. DEI GERMI , DOVE MICRO ORGANISMI INVISIBILI VENGONO ETICHETTATI COME AGENTI PATOGENI VIRALI CHE CAUSANO INFEZIONE E CONTAGIO, DA PASTEUR AD OGGI ANCORA LA PSEUDOVIROLOGIA SOSTIENE QUESTA IDIOZIA SOLO NELLA LORO TESTA, "CONFUTATA ", PIU' VOLTE IN QUESTO LASSO DI TEMPO, CI SONO ...O CI FANNNO ...!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Ermanno
You may want to read my following elaborate post. I cited you. But I have also been collecting data points on this sophistic virology deception topic for the past couple of years, which I just dumped publicly in the following Quora answer.
https://www.quora.com/What-is-billionaire-George-Soros%E2%80%99-ultimate-agenda/answer/S-Moore-152
Archived just in case it is removed:
https://archive.today/https://www.quora.com/What-is-billionaire-George-Soros’-ultimate-agenda/answer/S-Moore-152
https://archive.today/https://www.quora.com/profile/S-Moore-152
I loved this. Extremely eye-opening. Reminded me of Garett Kramer. I’m still stuck on one thing though.... herpes simplex. I don’t get cold sores on my lip anymore, and used to get them once a year (I’m hypothesizing that is because I’ve done several 30-day fasts and assume the autophagy killed the “virus” or removed it from my system). When I’d feel one surfacing, I would take the listed dose on an anti-viral medication (forget what it’s called but it’s standard prescription for cold sores. Zovirax? I don’t remember) and it would prevent the cold sore from surfacing into a large sore and keep it very small and only minorly noticeable. If a virus isn’t real, which may be true, then what is herpes simplex and how did the anti-viral medication work so successfully every time? When I was younger, I didn’t have that medication and the cold sores would become enormous. Herpes is very much contagious and can spread to others just from touch. This is hurting my brain! Can someone explain this?
Also, I noticed during my pregnancy that the only time I got a cold sore (it was 3rd trimester), my body suppressed it on its own without any use of medication. I would never use any kind of medication during pregnancy and apparently a pregnant woman’s immune system is weak (which I knew was probably bullshit and not true, and my body proved that it was in fact stronger during pregnancy). So my cold sore during pregnancy stayed soooo small and was gone within 2 days (very unusually short duration). After pregnancy I only got one more and it went away just as quickly without any prescription meds- all I used was an ointment containing emu oil, oregano oil, thyme oil, etc etc etc. just a dab. After lots or extended water fasts, my cold sores have never returned. It’s been nearly 3 years now.....
So what are cold sores if not viruses? Very confused and if anyone can shed some light I would be grateful to hear the discussion. Thanks.
Possibly another study to add to the list of failures but unfortunately it is not well documented. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/8F8AFD2468627E5ECD650B23B0FA791F/S0022172400027248a.pdf/studies_in_the_epidemiology_of_infectious_myxomatosis_of_rabbits_ii_field_experiments_augustnovember_1950_and_the_first_epizootic_of_myxomatosis_in_the_riverine_plain_of_southeastern_australia.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwiwoquH792BAxVYslYBHcpvBSAQFnoECCYQAQ&usg=AOvVaw35_ZZCATpEmleYFCgDHLEM
Yummy.Doctor explains the no virus in such a way kids can understand. She also has lots of info on common law. Amanda V.
Hey dpl,
I made a huge list of medical papers of which most of them are considered to be proof of pathogenicity, contagion etc. - including links to access them and PDFs (~600Mb).
I also have the complete paper by Schmitz 1920, the one by Williams et al. (1921)... I went through your list until 1949 (Polio and NY Health State Department) then I became lazy... sorry for that.
https://t.me/Medi_History
An exceptional article exploiting the true magic behind the show. Smoke and mirrors! I admire your commitment to this one particular topic that brings one of the largest house of cards down ever. There are no viruses, but there are infectious agents that won't be found as a virus. Man made illness via engineering, poisoning, and the encouragement of bad choices. Well done indeed.
Well done DPL!
Wow, links and references for everything!
Do you sleep?
Thanks 🔥
😢Funeral services for Germ Theory will be held at the Pasteur Museum at the Institut Pasteur, situated at 25 rue du Docteur Roux - 75015 Paris, France
Excellent work, thank you.