Great to hear the details that help bust the idea of germs causing disease. However, I have to point out one specific area - 'food poisoning'. Food that begins to rot can cause sickness when eaten. Breakdown toxins eaten within the food make people sick. To the best of my knowledge, bacteria in the food has never been proven to cause 'food poisoning' by interaction with human cells. This could be explained to the public sometime on substack.
Not pissing on your parade. Thanks dpl, but I cannot agree.
The example he, Dr Tom Cowan relates in the video was to do with Ignaz Semmelweis and his opinion as to cause of deaths in women who were giving birth. It is circa 1847. Times have changed since then. And washing hands has been proven as a very good method of preventing contamination as is using Povidone-iodine as an antiseptic for wounds pre-op and post-op.
We are not all doctors doing pathology and autopsies. So, we are not transferring diseased material that can cause sepsis. There is a reason for sterilisation of surgical instruments and scrubbing. Removal of contamination which can be bacterial or microbial that can result in disease. It's the same reason we wash our hands when working with food. Creating an aseptic environment. It could be fungal or spores or microorganisms or bacteria. I used to demonstrate this using bioluminescence to show how a surface could be identified as contaminated, before and after within a few seconds by detecting ATP presence.
Again, I ask what is E-Coli is. The E. coli bacteria that cause haemolytic uraemic syndrome make a toxin. It is called Shiga-toxin or STEC.
What then is bacterial sepsis?
Maybe you have direct contact with Dr. Tom Cowan. Or even better a pathologist.
We know that the scientific method facilitates empirical, rational, and sceptical approaches to observational data and minimizes human dependence on non-evidence-based traditional models.
In spite of the scientific method, physicians are still human, and the medical community still shows an inertial reluctance to adapt to new information when it disrupts traditional paradigms.
Recent examples would include reluctance to accept an etiologic role for the Helicobacter pylori bacterium in peptic ulcer disease. The discovery of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) in 1982. source: The J. Robin Warren and B. Marshall, “Unidentified curved bacilli on gastric epithelium in active chronic gastritis,” The Lancet, vol. 321, no. 8336, pp. 1273–1275, 1983.
I agree there are no viruses, however I don't agree there are no pathogenic organisms.
All I can say that you have some indoctrination to overcome. There are many things that do cause disease and they are normally the plethora of toxins we expose ourselves to. Washing your hands, exactly like Cowan explains, gits rid of most of these toxins which could cause trouble in an open wound or cervix. Then we have the body which is unbelievably complex with no way to tell exactly how it could react to toxins or even a combination of toxins.
Bacteria is not the cause of disease. Just like viruses, this has also never been proven. I do however remain open to being wrong about this so if you could provide evidence for it, I'd be happy to take a look at it.
Then there is mold and parasites. The story is the same. Below are some snippets by Daniel Roytas:
There are no pathogenic organisms except maybe if you consider the helpful effects of parasites breaking down highly toxic substances into something manageable.
All I can say is that maybe just is that you too have been indoctrinated into one dimensional reasoning?
Think typhoid, botulism. cholera, bacterial pneumonia (Streptococcus) and as I eluded to Helicobacter pylori.
Is it not strange that somehow there bacteria have been isolated and characterised and found in diseased patients. They have been demonstrated to cause disease in healthy people using Kochs postulates. They have been demonstrated to cause harm using control experiments. They are demonstrated to exist in Petri dishes through incubation. it also not strange that they are too found in every environment, both inside and outside other organisms, which does demonstrate that the germ theory of a clean environment ignores external factors? "plethora of toxins we expose ourselves to." Sure its the toxin that kills and causes the inflammation, but the bacteria are the ones creating the toxin. How else is a snake venom created in that body and that a snake is immune to its own toxin?
BTW, I do believe in naturopathic medicine which incorporates both modern medicine (anti-biotics) and ancient healing techniques.
You asked about evidence " Bacteria is not the cause of disease. Just like viruses, this has also never been proven. I do however remain open to being wrong about this so if you could provide evidence for it, I'd be happy to take a look at it."
First, you should not conflate viruses and bacteria. The existence of bacteria is proven. The existence of Viruses is not proven, so that is a ridiculous assertion IMO.
I would point you to Robert Koch who created the Koch postulates to prove existence of harmful bacteria. His hypothesis has not been disputed and he proved the cause of tuberculosis or anthrax both bacterial. Koch proved that anthrax is triggered by a single pathogen.
"There are no pathogenic organisms except maybe if you consider the helpful effects of parasites" Really, how then of course the is the fact that Malaria is a life-threatening disease caused by parasites, so that is a helpful parasite? What is in the parasite that causes the disease?
Maybe you should look at the proven life cycle of malaria. Then look into botulism, as I said earlier its the toxin that kills and causes the inflammation, but the bacteria are the ones creating the toxin.
I remember omitting the word [equivalent] in the sentence: The inject fluids into the lungs of ferrets with a volume that is [equivalent] to 100ml of fluids injected into the lungs of a grown man.
This was just to give the idea of how ludicrous the experiment is and to what extent they need to go to make animals sick in these experiments.
An awesome interview exposing the Virology tactics and deceptions.
This is a must share to expose the Virology fraud!
There is no virus!
There is no test!
There is no contagion!
We are awake to the Medical crimes!
Here is a copy of, "Farewell to Virology" as a reference.
https://drsambailey.com/a-farewell-to-virology-expert-edition/
RIP Germ Theory!
🔴Virology scam of the Century!
😢Funeral services for Germ Theory will be held at the Pasteur Museum at the Institut Pasteur, situated at 25 rue du Docteur Roux - 75015 Paris, France
Thanks Doug. You are a champ man!
Great to hear the details that help bust the idea of germs causing disease. However, I have to point out one specific area - 'food poisoning'. Food that begins to rot can cause sickness when eaten. Breakdown toxins eaten within the food make people sick. To the best of my knowledge, bacteria in the food has never been proven to cause 'food poisoning' by interaction with human cells. This could be explained to the public sometime on substack.
Agreed James. Bacteria does not cause disease. This is another assumption that was made to try and justify germ theory.
Question dpl. Like E. coli?
Why then do doctors i.e., the Allopathic Indoctrinated and others wash their hands and scrub before operating? What then is bacterial sepsis?
Please check out this mother of all reasons of why we wash our hands.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/3Y4axBVaRHdA/
Not pissing on your parade. Thanks dpl, but I cannot agree.
The example he, Dr Tom Cowan relates in the video was to do with Ignaz Semmelweis and his opinion as to cause of deaths in women who were giving birth. It is circa 1847. Times have changed since then. And washing hands has been proven as a very good method of preventing contamination as is using Povidone-iodine as an antiseptic for wounds pre-op and post-op.
We are not all doctors doing pathology and autopsies. So, we are not transferring diseased material that can cause sepsis. There is a reason for sterilisation of surgical instruments and scrubbing. Removal of contamination which can be bacterial or microbial that can result in disease. It's the same reason we wash our hands when working with food. Creating an aseptic environment. It could be fungal or spores or microorganisms or bacteria. I used to demonstrate this using bioluminescence to show how a surface could be identified as contaminated, before and after within a few seconds by detecting ATP presence.
Again, I ask what is E-Coli is. The E. coli bacteria that cause haemolytic uraemic syndrome make a toxin. It is called Shiga-toxin or STEC.
What then is bacterial sepsis?
Maybe you have direct contact with Dr. Tom Cowan. Or even better a pathologist.
We know that the scientific method facilitates empirical, rational, and sceptical approaches to observational data and minimizes human dependence on non-evidence-based traditional models.
In spite of the scientific method, physicians are still human, and the medical community still shows an inertial reluctance to adapt to new information when it disrupts traditional paradigms.
Recent examples would include reluctance to accept an etiologic role for the Helicobacter pylori bacterium in peptic ulcer disease. The discovery of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) in 1982. source: The J. Robin Warren and B. Marshall, “Unidentified curved bacilli on gastric epithelium in active chronic gastritis,” The Lancet, vol. 321, no. 8336, pp. 1273–1275, 1983.
I agree there are no viruses, however I don't agree there are no pathogenic organisms.
We also don't know what causes many diseases.
All I can say that you have some indoctrination to overcome. There are many things that do cause disease and they are normally the plethora of toxins we expose ourselves to. Washing your hands, exactly like Cowan explains, gits rid of most of these toxins which could cause trouble in an open wound or cervix. Then we have the body which is unbelievably complex with no way to tell exactly how it could react to toxins or even a combination of toxins.
Bacteria is not the cause of disease. Just like viruses, this has also never been proven. I do however remain open to being wrong about this so if you could provide evidence for it, I'd be happy to take a look at it.
Then there is mold and parasites. The story is the same. Below are some snippets by Daniel Roytas:
- https://twitter.com/dpl003/status/1725582498158059835?t=HKev-407QGaHsMVViD7g5g&s=19
- https://twitter.com/dpl003/status/1725580871795634602?t=HKev-407QGaHsMVViD7g5g&s=19
- https://twitter.com/dpl003/status/1673418403481022476?t=HKev-407QGaHsMVViD7g5g&s=19
I've also interviewed Daniel on this subject, and you can review that here - https://dpl003.substack.com/p/628cda38-4008-4204-afc3-a71cdb7cad8d
There are no pathogenic organisms except maybe if you consider the helpful effects of parasites breaking down highly toxic substances into something manageable.
All I can say is that maybe just is that you too have been indoctrinated into one dimensional reasoning?
Think typhoid, botulism. cholera, bacterial pneumonia (Streptococcus) and as I eluded to Helicobacter pylori.
Is it not strange that somehow there bacteria have been isolated and characterised and found in diseased patients. They have been demonstrated to cause disease in healthy people using Kochs postulates. They have been demonstrated to cause harm using control experiments. They are demonstrated to exist in Petri dishes through incubation. it also not strange that they are too found in every environment, both inside and outside other organisms, which does demonstrate that the germ theory of a clean environment ignores external factors? "plethora of toxins we expose ourselves to." Sure its the toxin that kills and causes the inflammation, but the bacteria are the ones creating the toxin. How else is a snake venom created in that body and that a snake is immune to its own toxin?
BTW, I do believe in naturopathic medicine which incorporates both modern medicine (anti-biotics) and ancient healing techniques.
You asked about evidence " Bacteria is not the cause of disease. Just like viruses, this has also never been proven. I do however remain open to being wrong about this so if you could provide evidence for it, I'd be happy to take a look at it."
First, you should not conflate viruses and bacteria. The existence of bacteria is proven. The existence of Viruses is not proven, so that is a ridiculous assertion IMO.
I would point you to Robert Koch who created the Koch postulates to prove existence of harmful bacteria. His hypothesis has not been disputed and he proved the cause of tuberculosis or anthrax both bacterial. Koch proved that anthrax is triggered by a single pathogen.
"There are no pathogenic organisms except maybe if you consider the helpful effects of parasites" Really, how then of course the is the fact that Malaria is a life-threatening disease caused by parasites, so that is a helpful parasite? What is in the parasite that causes the disease?
Maybe you should look at the proven life cycle of malaria. Then look into botulism, as I said earlier its the toxin that kills and causes the inflammation, but the bacteria are the ones creating the toxin.
Cheers. Stick to arguing viruses is my advice.
This was great. Listened carefully twice through. tysm.
Thanks Kyra,
I remember omitting the word [equivalent] in the sentence: The inject fluids into the lungs of ferrets with a volume that is [equivalent] to 100ml of fluids injected into the lungs of a grown man.
This was just to give the idea of how ludicrous the experiment is and to what extent they need to go to make animals sick in these experiments.
I am glad you enjoyed it :-)