Steve Kirsch had me banned from commenting on his substack because I kept asking about why he would not arrange a sitdown "debate" between he and his favorite virus believers and the Baileys, Cowan and Kauffman. After a month ban, they let me back in.
I then asked why he refused to mention (or bet) Ron Unz's multiple assertions that he and Kirsch had several communications where Unz questioned Kirsch's published death numbers (in Europe, I think). I asked several times on the substack and also sent emails.
I was permanently banned.
The king of the bettors slunk away from the Unz bet and quieted the only person asking about it on his substack.
"For someone to utter the words that “I don’t believe that viruses exist” it is a massive step in the right direction." Agreed, thank you for sharing the good news!
This is great news, I like Denis and have done for a long time. I felt that his addition to the gatekeepers club was little harsh as I it seemed that he was working towards this position, albeit slowly. But when you are in his position you would want to be more absolutely sure of the words you use than some one like me, who has the fortunate position of everyone already considering me idiot, so I can just take a position on instinct. He would have had far more to consider before declaring a position. Love your work DPL.
Wow! Great to hear, sure sounds like Denis is legit looking into virology. Also Kirsch clearly heard the no virus position, he can't pretend his doesn't know the points of dispute. Also glad Denis explained psychosomatic, I had 2 family members who were so terrified they had strokes in the fall of 2020.
This is very interesting. Of course Denis is more correct, though he’s having trouble explaining the low pO2, which in certain places was probably 5g (the cruise ships too). They only need to have 5g induced O2 dissociation in some hotspots to make it seem from a bug. Psychologic stress and other bugs aren’t enough to do this, and he mentions lung “infections” so he is out the window in multiple places.
Denis not getting to no-virus in 4 years is completely incongruent with his supposed intelligence, and he didn’t show normal inquisitiveness and ask people to explain it to him, he just said, “I’m studying the issue”, and well now it's too late (just like Yeadon). I personally have been able to explain the genome fakery to intelligent high schoolers and college students in 20 minutes showing them the Fan Wu methods section.
We know Kirsch is an operative, Denis is either just strange in his ways of understanding things, or he is a “soft operative” fomenting confusion, not to mention it is after the bombs have dropped to be no-virus. OR, it is even possible that Kirsch and Denis are purposely making a confused argument to dilute the no-virus narrative that has been gaining momentum making Denis go no-virus though he’s really stuck with contagion/transmission and low pO2 ergo discrediting his no-virus position. This is not an uncommon strategy.
Denis’ logic is so out the window and is demolished by Josh, that I'm pained to accept anything he might say. He is either really nutzo intelligentsia or a well-oiled subtle narrative spinner, I'm leaning towards the latter.
I worked in Cardiology for 30 years. The most common reason for low O2 Saturation in those finger monitors is Hyperventilation secondary to anxiety. Somebody tell Steve and his paramedics
Rancourt's tedious all-cause mortality study did not need to prove "no virus" in order to disprove the fake, gaslight narratives of (1) Gain of function (2) Lab Leak and (3) contagion. Steve should have nightmares over those 3 things even with no resolve on the "no virus" question but it doesn't sound like Steve even bothered to study Rancourt's data before he exposed his ignorance. Too busy with the eye liner I suppose.
Ha!....Steve throws out an uncontrolled, anecdotal challenge claiming an O2 Sat of 50% is unusual to a few first responders and expects it to sound like science.... Shame on Kirsch
I'm just now having the time to read this and I just saw the clip and whoa! He said that?! Kudos for capturing that! Curious to see who else is bold enough to take this step!
OMG! Rancourt wouldn’t stop droning, Kirsch flitted like a butterfly and together they put on an unlistenable-to (sorry!) interview. I managed the highlights video but had to turn off the longer one. Give me the measured, reasonable voices of Tom and Andy K.
There's no way of turning back from the determination of the missing virus evidence, except presenting the waterproof scientific validation by proper method.... So again, hence there is no way of turning back.
One can only ignore the issue or work around it.
But is that enough to stay in line for the next plndmc show?
Denis is not new to this topic. He has been well aware of the controversy throughout fake-covid and people have been prompting him to look into it and weigh in for a long time. He stated long ago that both he and his team were doing a deep dive into virology. It's nice to see him finally admit this much about "viruses", and disappointing to see him talking "pathogens", antibiotics and Ivermectin in this interview and on twitter.
Sam Bailey was actually a well known television personality in New Zealand before getting fired b/c of her position on fake-covid, and has been a leading force in exposing the pseudoscience since 2020. Denis is hardly a household name even here in Canada where he lives. So he is not the 1st well known person to realize that viruses don't exist - and actually I didn't hear him say that yet. He said that he hasn't found evidence that viruses do exist.
I hope he doesn't now turn the focus from imaginary viruses to bacteria as causal agents of illness, in general or in relation to fake-covid... because some of his recent tweets have suggested this.
Steve Kirsch had me banned from commenting on his substack because I kept asking about why he would not arrange a sitdown "debate" between he and his favorite virus believers and the Baileys, Cowan and Kauffman. After a month ban, they let me back in.
I then asked why he refused to mention (or bet) Ron Unz's multiple assertions that he and Kirsch had several communications where Unz questioned Kirsch's published death numbers (in Europe, I think). I asked several times on the substack and also sent emails.
I was permanently banned.
The king of the bettors slunk away from the Unz bet and quieted the only person asking about it on his substack.
Kirsch is a gate keeper, imo.
"For someone to utter the words that “I don’t believe that viruses exist” it is a massive step in the right direction." Agreed, thank you for sharing the good news!
Twas the eyeliner on Steve, that gave it away....
This is great news, I like Denis and have done for a long time. I felt that his addition to the gatekeepers club was little harsh as I it seemed that he was working towards this position, albeit slowly. But when you are in his position you would want to be more absolutely sure of the words you use than some one like me, who has the fortunate position of everyone already considering me idiot, so I can just take a position on instinct. He would have had far more to consider before declaring a position. Love your work DPL.
Wow! Great to hear, sure sounds like Denis is legit looking into virology. Also Kirsch clearly heard the no virus position, he can't pretend his doesn't know the points of dispute. Also glad Denis explained psychosomatic, I had 2 family members who were so terrified they had strokes in the fall of 2020.
This is very interesting. Of course Denis is more correct, though he’s having trouble explaining the low pO2, which in certain places was probably 5g (the cruise ships too). They only need to have 5g induced O2 dissociation in some hotspots to make it seem from a bug. Psychologic stress and other bugs aren’t enough to do this, and he mentions lung “infections” so he is out the window in multiple places.
Denis not getting to no-virus in 4 years is completely incongruent with his supposed intelligence, and he didn’t show normal inquisitiveness and ask people to explain it to him, he just said, “I’m studying the issue”, and well now it's too late (just like Yeadon). I personally have been able to explain the genome fakery to intelligent high schoolers and college students in 20 minutes showing them the Fan Wu methods section.
We know Kirsch is an operative, Denis is either just strange in his ways of understanding things, or he is a “soft operative” fomenting confusion, not to mention it is after the bombs have dropped to be no-virus. OR, it is even possible that Kirsch and Denis are purposely making a confused argument to dilute the no-virus narrative that has been gaining momentum making Denis go no-virus though he’s really stuck with contagion/transmission and low pO2 ergo discrediting his no-virus position. This is not an uncommon strategy.
Here on 9.11, https://www.bitchute.com/video/e8U1lTkWNGJq/
Denis’ logic is so out the window and is demolished by Josh, that I'm pained to accept anything he might say. He is either really nutzo intelligentsia or a well-oiled subtle narrative spinner, I'm leaning towards the latter.
Denis has a large number of people who respect his research. This is likely a good thing.
I worked in Cardiology for 30 years. The most common reason for low O2 Saturation in those finger monitors is Hyperventilation secondary to anxiety. Somebody tell Steve and his paramedics
Rancourt's tedious all-cause mortality study did not need to prove "no virus" in order to disprove the fake, gaslight narratives of (1) Gain of function (2) Lab Leak and (3) contagion. Steve should have nightmares over those 3 things even with no resolve on the "no virus" question but it doesn't sound like Steve even bothered to study Rancourt's data before he exposed his ignorance. Too busy with the eye liner I suppose.
Ha!....Steve throws out an uncontrolled, anecdotal challenge claiming an O2 Sat of 50% is unusual to a few first responders and expects it to sound like science.... Shame on Kirsch
I'm just now having the time to read this and I just saw the clip and whoa! He said that?! Kudos for capturing that! Curious to see who else is bold enough to take this step!
OMG! Rancourt wouldn’t stop droning, Kirsch flitted like a butterfly and together they put on an unlistenable-to (sorry!) interview. I managed the highlights video but had to turn off the longer one. Give me the measured, reasonable voices of Tom and Andy K.
There's no way of turning back from the determination of the missing virus evidence, except presenting the waterproof scientific validation by proper method.... So again, hence there is no way of turning back.
One can only ignore the issue or work around it.
But is that enough to stay in line for the next plndmc show?
🙌🙌🙌🙌
Really good news and very valuable analysis by DPL.
DPL. would you be ready to discuss other globalist dogmas complementing the dogma of virus?
Denis is not new to this topic. He has been well aware of the controversy throughout fake-covid and people have been prompting him to look into it and weigh in for a long time. He stated long ago that both he and his team were doing a deep dive into virology. It's nice to see him finally admit this much about "viruses", and disappointing to see him talking "pathogens", antibiotics and Ivermectin in this interview and on twitter.
Sam Bailey was actually a well known television personality in New Zealand before getting fired b/c of her position on fake-covid, and has been a leading force in exposing the pseudoscience since 2020. Denis is hardly a household name even here in Canada where he lives. So he is not the 1st well known person to realize that viruses don't exist - and actually I didn't hear him say that yet. He said that he hasn't found evidence that viruses do exist.
I hope he doesn't now turn the focus from imaginary viruses to bacteria as causal agents of illness, in general or in relation to fake-covid... because some of his recent tweets have suggested this.