This was kinda hard to listen to with that person half believing in non existing particles and immune systems etc but DPL made it worth listening to again.
One fundamental principle everyone seems to miss;
A sick person can never make a healthy person sick because: what we call "being sick" is the body's therapy for healing a buildup of toxins (in whatever form). "Sick" is detoxing previously built up shit. You CAN NOT make ANYONE SICK because you CAN NOT make anyone else detox!
Or smoke someone else's cigarettes or eat someone else's crap food FOR them. Detoxing is your OWN process and can obviously not be transferred to somebody else who simply have their own terrain and body.
Now, what DOES need to be looked into further is the possibility of MAYBE people having the ability to - through systems like bioresonance or pheromones - trigger people around them to also start THEIR OWN detox symptoms (as far as needed, as that only applies to 'sick' tissue aka an unclean terrain).
So basically - smoking cigarettes (and I'm not to keen on this whole idea either but for the sake of the point Im making) may turn into lung cancer.
- Smoking and having black lungs for 20 years was the "sick" part.
- Getting cancer is the body's therapy (the healing or cleaning/isolating part). This is what idiot doctors call "disease".
Virologists basically argue that people with lung cancer can give healthy people BLACK LUNGS 🤣.
These twitter spaces are sometimes unbearable. There are literally hundreds of trained trolls that come to disrupt the space. I think Amy did a very good job but I'll definitely talk to her some more on how to streamline things. Thank you for your comment.
If Erin's daughter was given any fluoroquinolone antibiotics such as Cipro she could be suffering from the deadly side effects. Fluoroquinolones are quite popular in the medical community in-spite of the black box warnings including ruptured tendons. I suffered with a ruptured Achilles tendon after a course of Tequin (a fluoroquinolone brand no longer produced) prescribed for an allergic reaction from neosporin misdiagnosed as an infection. At the time I was a home builder and healthy an 52. I ran into another person who almost died after being given Cipro after carpal tunnel surgery. The injuries from fluoroquinolones include body parts other than tendons.
So you're looking into people. Are we allowed to know who you are? What is your name? When did you begin to tackle all this? Those are very specific questions. You are calling people out, and I am just asking what your name is. And if you say: "I don't have to give my name," then you do have to accept that you are anonymous. If so, why?
Another question: Peter Duesberg, who Lanka does not hate, who Perth Group never hated, Huw Christie never hated, (we all used to get along) he blew up HIV as pathogen and blew up AIDS as transmissible. Starting in 1987. PG came along soon after, early 90s, and then Lanka, mid 90s. Duesberg said HIV/AIDS was not sexually transmissible, at the peak peak peak of global hysteria. Is that really NOTHING, in your book? He's just complete garbage, to you people? That's really uncharitable.
big TQ for all the work you do. there's a number of MPs in my family and we can still love and respect one another, but it's impossible to mention anything that goes against their AMA-sponsored training and allopathic "insights" - total brainwash. it makes me feel sorry for their patients :-((
I know this can be so frustrating. If they are "educated" I normally try and challenge them where they will look stupid if they decline. Like saying see the below article. It contains close to 100 peer reviewed studies proving that the field of virology is pseudoscience: https://dpl003.substack.com/p/virology-the-damning-evidence
But jea. It is an uphill battle. We'll just keep on keeping on
It is disorienting to listen to a "bot there yet" virus believer ask, "Why some people get sick and others fo not get sick". Embedded in this polemical question is belief in virology: the virus is there so why don't some folks get sick? Immunity?
Why ask questions of any kind if no proof is needed to supply answers? There is obviously no proof of the existence of any virus, and futher the notion is riddled with contradictions. So any virus believer certainly seems indifferent to science and proof, because the proven lack of such doesn't change their belief.
So why then V-believers ask why some don't get sick is an enduring mystery. Why ask? Maybe its unicorn intervention that saves people. Or Divine Protection. Or White Witches.
In the US, there's no question there were an unprecedented number of deaths in 2020 & 2021--so I assume there were also an unprecedented number of sick people. Sick from what? No reason to think it's a weaponized virus--more probably a chemical weapon.
This was kinda hard to listen to with that person half believing in non existing particles and immune systems etc but DPL made it worth listening to again.
One fundamental principle everyone seems to miss;
A sick person can never make a healthy person sick because: what we call "being sick" is the body's therapy for healing a buildup of toxins (in whatever form). "Sick" is detoxing previously built up shit. You CAN NOT make ANYONE SICK because you CAN NOT make anyone else detox!
Or smoke someone else's cigarettes or eat someone else's crap food FOR them. Detoxing is your OWN process and can obviously not be transferred to somebody else who simply have their own terrain and body.
Now, what DOES need to be looked into further is the possibility of MAYBE people having the ability to - through systems like bioresonance or pheromones - trigger people around them to also start THEIR OWN detox symptoms (as far as needed, as that only applies to 'sick' tissue aka an unclean terrain).
So basically - smoking cigarettes (and I'm not to keen on this whole idea either but for the sake of the point Im making) may turn into lung cancer.
- Smoking and having black lungs for 20 years was the "sick" part.
- Getting cancer is the body's therapy (the healing or cleaning/isolating part). This is what idiot doctors call "disease".
Virologists basically argue that people with lung cancer can give healthy people BLACK LUNGS 🤣.
Spot on!
These twitter spaces are sometimes unbearable. There are literally hundreds of trained trolls that come to disrupt the space. I think Amy did a very good job but I'll definitely talk to her some more on how to streamline things. Thank you for your comment.
If Erin's daughter was given any fluoroquinolone antibiotics such as Cipro she could be suffering from the deadly side effects. Fluoroquinolones are quite popular in the medical community in-spite of the black box warnings including ruptured tendons. I suffered with a ruptured Achilles tendon after a course of Tequin (a fluoroquinolone brand no longer produced) prescribed for an allergic reaction from neosporin misdiagnosed as an infection. At the time I was a home builder and healthy an 52. I ran into another person who almost died after being given Cipro after carpal tunnel surgery. The injuries from fluoroquinolones include body parts other than tendons.
So you're looking into people. Are we allowed to know who you are? What is your name? When did you begin to tackle all this? Those are very specific questions. You are calling people out, and I am just asking what your name is. And if you say: "I don't have to give my name," then you do have to accept that you are anonymous. If so, why?
Another question: Peter Duesberg, who Lanka does not hate, who Perth Group never hated, Huw Christie never hated, (we all used to get along) he blew up HIV as pathogen and blew up AIDS as transmissible. Starting in 1987. PG came along soon after, early 90s, and then Lanka, mid 90s. Duesberg said HIV/AIDS was not sexually transmissible, at the peak peak peak of global hysteria. Is that really NOTHING, in your book? He's just complete garbage, to you people? That's really uncharitable.
Is this comment adressed to dpl ?
big TQ for all the work you do. there's a number of MPs in my family and we can still love and respect one another, but it's impossible to mention anything that goes against their AMA-sponsored training and allopathic "insights" - total brainwash. it makes me feel sorry for their patients :-((
Thanks a lot :-)
I know this can be so frustrating. If they are "educated" I normally try and challenge them where they will look stupid if they decline. Like saying see the below article. It contains close to 100 peer reviewed studies proving that the field of virology is pseudoscience: https://dpl003.substack.com/p/virology-the-damning-evidence
But jea. It is an uphill battle. We'll just keep on keeping on
that we will
It is disorienting to listen to a "bot there yet" virus believer ask, "Why some people get sick and others fo not get sick". Embedded in this polemical question is belief in virology: the virus is there so why don't some folks get sick? Immunity?
Why ask questions of any kind if no proof is needed to supply answers? There is obviously no proof of the existence of any virus, and futher the notion is riddled with contradictions. So any virus believer certainly seems indifferent to science and proof, because the proven lack of such doesn't change their belief.
So why then V-believers ask why some don't get sick is an enduring mystery. Why ask? Maybe its unicorn intervention that saves people. Or Divine Protection. Or White Witches.
In the US, there's no question there were an unprecedented number of deaths in 2020 & 2021--so I assume there were also an unprecedented number of sick people. Sick from what? No reason to think it's a weaponized virus--more probably a chemical weapon.