Thanks dpl for the reminder that 'Doublespeak' is alive and well. The use of the precursor 'Novel' in Mikes statements is so subtle that I and my subconscious missed it.
Again, as you've said so often, Virology is fantasy. Just as 'Theoretical Physicist' is someone who writes Fairytales as if they are factual 'Conclusions.' A game is being played by people like RFK. It takes a really strong effort of will to resist Elephants in The Room like the Enders Paper (69 years old) and the 1918 failed Contagion Experiments (105 years old).
You wrote well & I read carefully from start to finish. In terms of objectively referencing what I’ve said, you’ve done an excellent job.
However, in interpreting underlying thinking and definitely in terms of motivations and intentions, you’ve been way too certain, when you cannot know either.
Your implied conclusion is that in some way, I’m on the side of the perpetrators of this appalling global crime.
All I can say to that, rather bitterly, is thanks a bunch. I’ve given freely of my time, indeed ALL of it, for well over three years, with no compensation sought or received, placing my life & certainly liberty at risk, in order to tell as many people as possible that THEY'RE BEING LIED TO,
The purpose of the lies is, ultimately, to seize totalitarian control over almost every human being and then to kill a substantial proportion of them. Absolutely horrifying. The realisation of the magnitude of what’s happening & the implications in terms of multigenerational planning cannot be described without using the word EVIL & the underlying motivation being satanic.
Now, quite early on, I realised that there was no new, disease-causing agent, no new illness & so no conceivable use in a vaccine.
Even if the official narrative was correct, there’s copious evidence confirming that creating a new material alleged to be a vaccine would be an ineffective approach & additionally, one which couldn’t possibly be completed in a time period relevant to the duration of a pandemic.
Here’s a really important thing for you to consider. I’ve spoken at length to at least half a dozen reasonably prominent truth tellers (those exposing official lies with a view to enslaving then killing large numbers of people). Without exception I’ve been unable to persuade a single one that “viruses do not exist”. I have little doubt you’ll be surprised at this, but that’s what I’ve found.
For myself, while I am ready to accept that no viruses exist, there’s a second really important point for you to appreciate. The failure to reasonably isolate & confirm the nature of infective substances called viruses is not unequivocal proof of non-existence. The old saw is helpful here, “Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence”. While it’s absurd to say “It’s possible somebody could properly isolate a virus tomorrow”, it’s literally true (albeit very, very unlikely).
Personally, I have determined empirically that even someone like me, 42 years since beginning training broadly in biological sciences, is unable to persuade a single, sympathetic person of the terminal problems with virology. Not one.
They mostly don’t want to believe it’s all been lies, and mostly they won’t read the carefully written articles by Sam or Mark Bailey, of by Tom Cowan or Andrew Kaufman (I clearly got bits of their names mixed up & I apologise for that).
I say again, with these clever people, with whom I’ve worked for up to three years, who know I’m reasonably bright and of good heart, I’ve been unable to persuade even one to do the leg work required to get to roughly where I am.
Now translate the setting to one in which most of the audience have been told I’m “a fraud, a grifter, an embittered former employee”. What would you reckon would be the chances that I would carry anyone with me if I start by saying “I no longer believe there are such things as respiratory illness-causing agents that are called viruses”. I know the answer. They immediately disbelieve anything else I might say.
That’s not my fault. It is however a reality we’ve no choice but to deal with.
I therefore years ago concluded that I would pick different lines of attack to expose the existence of fraud and then to show evidence of motive: to coerce billions to roll up their sleeves for an injection that’s “toxic by design”.
Failure to deal with this will lead to enslavement of all humanity using methods that once in place will be impossible to remove or escape from & I expect will be followed by radical global depopulation, using coerced, repeated injections of mRNA encoding non-self proteins. These will kill, if enough of a dose is administered sufficiently often, through fulminant autoimmune attack on one’s own tissues.
So I’ve stuck to my guns. It’s getting easier to demonstrable that there never was a pandemic. Furthermore, I have found people very receptive to the next item, that the countermeasures they were forced into doing, are all useless and indeed harmful, and that this was known to the perpetrators before they impose them.
It’s also a factual matter to show them the numerous meta analyses telling us that the injectable messes, termed flu vaccines, do not reduce hospitalization or death from flu-like illnesses.
In terms of the deliberately dangerous “covid19” “vaccines”, it’s paradoxically a big advantage that I never worked in a vaccines division. These complex biological entities are nothing like old school vaccines & so it would be no advantage to be a professional vaccinolpgist. Instead, being highly experienced in “rational drug design”, I can easily see intent in the basic design elements of these gene-based injections. When I explain to almost anyone, including those sceptical of the “no virus” narrative, they readily get it that they must, axiomatically, cause autoimmune attack on any tissue that takes up the injected material. If you express non-self proteins then, with very few exceptions, you’ll see autoimmune attack by the full night of your immune system.
The scientific method is very poor at proving negatives. All it can do is fail to find evidence of something. Eventually you reach a point where you’ll peel off and say to yourself “I don’t believe viruses exist”. That’s not a property of the scientific method. It’s really useful for many things, but proving negatives isn’t one of them. So that peeling off point isn’t scientific but a matter of faith. This is what makes it so hard to persuade someone psychologically wholly caught in Desmet’s “mass formation” to even consider matters such as we’re exchanging on here (the virus existential problem).
I’ve not found it helpful to swim in these waters. The audience, unless they’ve already made the intellectual as well as faith journeys themselves, just don’t & perhaps can’t follow an expose that begins with “I’ve come to the conclusion that respiratory viruses as a class do not exist”. The effect of me making such a claim, especially at the start of an interview, is that most of the audience now discounts pretty much everything else I tell them.
So I’ve mostly steered clear of the controversy. For pities sake, there’s so much low hanging fruit on other lies and evil intent.
Finally, there’s absolutely nothing in all this for me. I’m so grateful for the love, support and belief of my wife and young adult children. I have one sister who believes me. Everybody else in my own family call me a conspiracy theorist and I’m estranged from those in both Australia and in the USA. I’ve lost a lot of money in consulting fees foregone. I was fired by all my clients in summer 2020. My health isn’t the best & I am regrettably fairly sure that carrying this burden is substantially responsible for its worsening. I don’t stop, because there’s no where to run or hide.
As you pursue your appropriate passion, I ask that you evaluate the effectiveness of your own methods in persuading those who remain fooled by the lies. If I can learn somethings that help me, I’d very likely adopt them.
As for Liberty Places, I made a moderate sized gift to the founders. I never had any other involvement in it. I don’t even own a shake, because they burned through the money!
If, having read this, you still think I’m some kind of black hat wearing schemer, I’ll wish you good day.
All the best
Mike
Dr Mike Yeadon
Ps: it’s 3am & I’m too knackered to proof read this. Apologies for any typos.
Great stuff dpl. Can you share an opinion about George Webb and Brendon O'Connell? I'm pretty new to this game of deception and all the layers to it.
George is seemingly putting in an honest effort to follow the breadcumbs, especially recently with DOMANE and Bob Malone. He teams up a lot with Mark Kulacz of Housatonic Live.
Brendon's theories generally point back to Israel. Also he is pushing the Mike Gill / NH corruption story, which doesn't seem to want to be touched by anyone.
The fact he does not clearly state that viruses actually do not exist can be explained by a very simply truth that anyone familiar with Miles Mathis work should know by now, the actual fact is that Mike Yeadon is another Jewish from the elite peerage families playing a role and he cannot get over the limits imposed by the role he is playing, that is of controlled opposition. It is as simple as that brother.
Amazing research! Wow! Not only is everything in plain sight, it's also in plain words spoken to us by these psychopaths; like the use of the word "novel."
One of the comments called him 'a piece of garbage'. I don't think Yeadon was deliberately misleading people - he called out the scamdemic from the very beginning. I fail to see what the problem is with his real-estate plans and Oman? What exactly is wrong with these plans? Yeadon has been one of the best critics of the Scamdemic. He speaks well and he has also questioned the validity of viral/contagion theory.
Mike Yeadon has been very critical of the Scamdemic right from the start and he is open-minded. He’s certainly not ‘a pice of garbage’. Not everyone is on exactly the same page. Because of his background he understands the corruption in the pharma industry plus it gives him credibility.
You dpl are a trouble making twit shill clown. FFS, talk about overanalysing and paranoid ideation, reading between the lines far too much. You clearly have not been here from the outset, for if you had been paying attention from the outset, you would never question the genuinity of Dr Mike Yeadon. You are making the deep state controlled opp rub their hands together in glee, doing their dirty work for them with your ridiculous overanalysis. Not to mention your complete absence of a profile, and you think we are going to believe you?
It took me less than five minutes to come to full understanding that THERE IS NO VIRUS after watching Stefan Lanka Video, LESS THAN FIVE MINUTES - The emphasis on it is due to one being AWARE of OTHER Conspiracy in the world would be easier to understand the Virus Con.
I think people who believe in Virus still are those who are into conspiracy recently, they do not know about chemtrails, 911 inside job, freemasons, illuminati etc etc - If you are in conspiracy for a decade or two, it would be a piece of cake. If Mike is new to conspiracy, it would be hard for him to comprehend what actually is going on in this world how evil satanic this whole system is from get go.
It would be interesting to know what Mike thinks about chemtrails, 911, fluorides in toothpaste etc
"Dear Mr. Hancock, I have a degree in Biochemistry & Toxicology & a research-based PhD in pharmacology. I have spent 32 years working in pharmaceutical R&D, mostly in new medicines for disorders of lung & skin. I was a VP at Pfizer & CEO of a biotech I founded Ziarco (acquired by Novartis). I’m knowledgeable about new medicine R&D. I have read the consultation document. I’ve rarely been as shocked & upset. All vaccines against the SARS-COV-2 virus are by definition novel. No candidate vaccine has been in development for more than a few months. My concern does not arise because I have negative views about vaccines (I don’t)." BAM!!💥🔨
Conclusion: Don't trust anyone who says they support vaccination, even if they claim to oppose the c-vax. They want people to believe it's the only shot that's dangerous and that there's always an alternative if you're vaccine-hesitant. Big Pharma wins either way. How many patients has Yeadon harmed in the 32 years he's been in business? One thing is for certain and it's that he's contributed to one of the leading causes of US death, just as Malone, McCullough, Campbell and the rest of the quacks posing as "'truth-tellers" have.
Thanks for doing a follow-up on this piece of garbage.
Mikki Willis at 9/11 ground zero and the Rodney King trial, what are the odds?
The tide is shifting!
All the Gatekeepers being exposed in record time.
Educate, Evaluate and Expose them one at a time.
Yes, pay attention to his words. I'm learning from the best.
Thanks dpl for the reminder that 'Doublespeak' is alive and well. The use of the precursor 'Novel' in Mikes statements is so subtle that I and my subconscious missed it.
Again, as you've said so often, Virology is fantasy. Just as 'Theoretical Physicist' is someone who writes Fairytales as if they are factual 'Conclusions.' A game is being played by people like RFK. It takes a really strong effort of will to resist Elephants in The Room like the Enders Paper (69 years old) and the 1918 failed Contagion Experiments (105 years old).
Dear DPL,
You wrote well & I read carefully from start to finish. In terms of objectively referencing what I’ve said, you’ve done an excellent job.
However, in interpreting underlying thinking and definitely in terms of motivations and intentions, you’ve been way too certain, when you cannot know either.
Your implied conclusion is that in some way, I’m on the side of the perpetrators of this appalling global crime.
All I can say to that, rather bitterly, is thanks a bunch. I’ve given freely of my time, indeed ALL of it, for well over three years, with no compensation sought or received, placing my life & certainly liberty at risk, in order to tell as many people as possible that THEY'RE BEING LIED TO,
The purpose of the lies is, ultimately, to seize totalitarian control over almost every human being and then to kill a substantial proportion of them. Absolutely horrifying. The realisation of the magnitude of what’s happening & the implications in terms of multigenerational planning cannot be described without using the word EVIL & the underlying motivation being satanic.
Now, quite early on, I realised that there was no new, disease-causing agent, no new illness & so no conceivable use in a vaccine.
Even if the official narrative was correct, there’s copious evidence confirming that creating a new material alleged to be a vaccine would be an ineffective approach & additionally, one which couldn’t possibly be completed in a time period relevant to the duration of a pandemic.
Here’s a really important thing for you to consider. I’ve spoken at length to at least half a dozen reasonably prominent truth tellers (those exposing official lies with a view to enslaving then killing large numbers of people). Without exception I’ve been unable to persuade a single one that “viruses do not exist”. I have little doubt you’ll be surprised at this, but that’s what I’ve found.
For myself, while I am ready to accept that no viruses exist, there’s a second really important point for you to appreciate. The failure to reasonably isolate & confirm the nature of infective substances called viruses is not unequivocal proof of non-existence. The old saw is helpful here, “Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence”. While it’s absurd to say “It’s possible somebody could properly isolate a virus tomorrow”, it’s literally true (albeit very, very unlikely).
Personally, I have determined empirically that even someone like me, 42 years since beginning training broadly in biological sciences, is unable to persuade a single, sympathetic person of the terminal problems with virology. Not one.
They mostly don’t want to believe it’s all been lies, and mostly they won’t read the carefully written articles by Sam or Mark Bailey, of by Tom Cowan or Andrew Kaufman (I clearly got bits of their names mixed up & I apologise for that).
I say again, with these clever people, with whom I’ve worked for up to three years, who know I’m reasonably bright and of good heart, I’ve been unable to persuade even one to do the leg work required to get to roughly where I am.
Now translate the setting to one in which most of the audience have been told I’m “a fraud, a grifter, an embittered former employee”. What would you reckon would be the chances that I would carry anyone with me if I start by saying “I no longer believe there are such things as respiratory illness-causing agents that are called viruses”. I know the answer. They immediately disbelieve anything else I might say.
That’s not my fault. It is however a reality we’ve no choice but to deal with.
I therefore years ago concluded that I would pick different lines of attack to expose the existence of fraud and then to show evidence of motive: to coerce billions to roll up their sleeves for an injection that’s “toxic by design”.
Failure to deal with this will lead to enslavement of all humanity using methods that once in place will be impossible to remove or escape from & I expect will be followed by radical global depopulation, using coerced, repeated injections of mRNA encoding non-self proteins. These will kill, if enough of a dose is administered sufficiently often, through fulminant autoimmune attack on one’s own tissues.
So I’ve stuck to my guns. It’s getting easier to demonstrable that there never was a pandemic. Furthermore, I have found people very receptive to the next item, that the countermeasures they were forced into doing, are all useless and indeed harmful, and that this was known to the perpetrators before they impose them.
It’s also a factual matter to show them the numerous meta analyses telling us that the injectable messes, termed flu vaccines, do not reduce hospitalization or death from flu-like illnesses.
In terms of the deliberately dangerous “covid19” “vaccines”, it’s paradoxically a big advantage that I never worked in a vaccines division. These complex biological entities are nothing like old school vaccines & so it would be no advantage to be a professional vaccinolpgist. Instead, being highly experienced in “rational drug design”, I can easily see intent in the basic design elements of these gene-based injections. When I explain to almost anyone, including those sceptical of the “no virus” narrative, they readily get it that they must, axiomatically, cause autoimmune attack on any tissue that takes up the injected material. If you express non-self proteins then, with very few exceptions, you’ll see autoimmune attack by the full night of your immune system.
The scientific method is very poor at proving negatives. All it can do is fail to find evidence of something. Eventually you reach a point where you’ll peel off and say to yourself “I don’t believe viruses exist”. That’s not a property of the scientific method. It’s really useful for many things, but proving negatives isn’t one of them. So that peeling off point isn’t scientific but a matter of faith. This is what makes it so hard to persuade someone psychologically wholly caught in Desmet’s “mass formation” to even consider matters such as we’re exchanging on here (the virus existential problem).
I’ve not found it helpful to swim in these waters. The audience, unless they’ve already made the intellectual as well as faith journeys themselves, just don’t & perhaps can’t follow an expose that begins with “I’ve come to the conclusion that respiratory viruses as a class do not exist”. The effect of me making such a claim, especially at the start of an interview, is that most of the audience now discounts pretty much everything else I tell them.
So I’ve mostly steered clear of the controversy. For pities sake, there’s so much low hanging fruit on other lies and evil intent.
Finally, there’s absolutely nothing in all this for me. I’m so grateful for the love, support and belief of my wife and young adult children. I have one sister who believes me. Everybody else in my own family call me a conspiracy theorist and I’m estranged from those in both Australia and in the USA. I’ve lost a lot of money in consulting fees foregone. I was fired by all my clients in summer 2020. My health isn’t the best & I am regrettably fairly sure that carrying this burden is substantially responsible for its worsening. I don’t stop, because there’s no where to run or hide.
As you pursue your appropriate passion, I ask that you evaluate the effectiveness of your own methods in persuading those who remain fooled by the lies. If I can learn somethings that help me, I’d very likely adopt them.
As for Liberty Places, I made a moderate sized gift to the founders. I never had any other involvement in it. I don’t even own a shake, because they burned through the money!
If, having read this, you still think I’m some kind of black hat wearing schemer, I’ll wish you good day.
All the best
Mike
Dr Mike Yeadon
Ps: it’s 3am & I’m too knackered to proof read this. Apologies for any typos.
Great stuff dpl. Can you share an opinion about George Webb and Brendon O'Connell? I'm pretty new to this game of deception and all the layers to it.
George is seemingly putting in an honest effort to follow the breadcumbs, especially recently with DOMANE and Bob Malone. He teams up a lot with Mark Kulacz of Housatonic Live.
Brendon's theories generally point back to Israel. Also he is pushing the Mike Gill / NH corruption story, which doesn't seem to want to be touched by anyone.
The fact he does not clearly state that viruses actually do not exist can be explained by a very simply truth that anyone familiar with Miles Mathis work should know by now, the actual fact is that Mike Yeadon is another Jewish from the elite peerage families playing a role and he cannot get over the limits imposed by the role he is playing, that is of controlled opposition. It is as simple as that brother.
you might find this conversation with Mike from April to August interesting - I did notice his choice of language https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/what-they-really-dont-want-us-talking/comments
dpl, what is your telegram channel..
Amazing research! Wow! Not only is everything in plain sight, it's also in plain words spoken to us by these psychopaths; like the use of the word "novel."
Excellent work! :)
One of the comments called him 'a piece of garbage'. I don't think Yeadon was deliberately misleading people - he called out the scamdemic from the very beginning. I fail to see what the problem is with his real-estate plans and Oman? What exactly is wrong with these plans? Yeadon has been one of the best critics of the Scamdemic. He speaks well and he has also questioned the validity of viral/contagion theory.
I will be trying my best.
There are so many ways to describe the obvious fraud that is tightening it noose around our necks.
If listeners / watchers choose to believe any of what I said, it’d be over.
I’m over 110 interviews, others have done more, yet its hard to detect the combined influence and the digital ID seems imminent.
Mike Yeadon has been very critical of the Scamdemic right from the start and he is open-minded. He’s certainly not ‘a pice of garbage’. Not everyone is on exactly the same page. Because of his background he understands the corruption in the pharma industry plus it gives him credibility.
You dpl are a trouble making twit shill clown. FFS, talk about overanalysing and paranoid ideation, reading between the lines far too much. You clearly have not been here from the outset, for if you had been paying attention from the outset, you would never question the genuinity of Dr Mike Yeadon. You are making the deep state controlled opp rub their hands together in glee, doing their dirty work for them with your ridiculous overanalysis. Not to mention your complete absence of a profile, and you think we are going to believe you?
It took me less than five minutes to come to full understanding that THERE IS NO VIRUS after watching Stefan Lanka Video, LESS THAN FIVE MINUTES - The emphasis on it is due to one being AWARE of OTHER Conspiracy in the world would be easier to understand the Virus Con.
I think people who believe in Virus still are those who are into conspiracy recently, they do not know about chemtrails, 911 inside job, freemasons, illuminati etc etc - If you are in conspiracy for a decade or two, it would be a piece of cake. If Mike is new to conspiracy, it would be hard for him to comprehend what actually is going on in this world how evil satanic this whole system is from get go.
It would be interesting to know what Mike thinks about chemtrails, 911, fluorides in toothpaste etc
Good work and proof that we can't take these purported "white hats" at face value even when they appear to be genuine.
Letter from Dr. Michael Yeadon, (former VP of Pfizer) to MP Matt Hancock, UK.
https://vk.com/@papaduvalier-letter-from-dr-michael-yeadon-former-vp-of-pfizer-to-mp-matt
"Dear Mr. Hancock, I have a degree in Biochemistry & Toxicology & a research-based PhD in pharmacology. I have spent 32 years working in pharmaceutical R&D, mostly in new medicines for disorders of lung & skin. I was a VP at Pfizer & CEO of a biotech I founded Ziarco (acquired by Novartis). I’m knowledgeable about new medicine R&D. I have read the consultation document. I’ve rarely been as shocked & upset. All vaccines against the SARS-COV-2 virus are by definition novel. No candidate vaccine has been in development for more than a few months. My concern does not arise because I have negative views about vaccines (I don’t)." BAM!!💥🔨
Conclusion: Don't trust anyone who says they support vaccination, even if they claim to oppose the c-vax. They want people to believe it's the only shot that's dangerous and that there's always an alternative if you're vaccine-hesitant. Big Pharma wins either way. How many patients has Yeadon harmed in the 32 years he's been in business? One thing is for certain and it's that he's contributed to one of the leading causes of US death, just as Malone, McCullough, Campbell and the rest of the quacks posing as "'truth-tellers" have.