A Follow-Up on Mike Yeadon

Please tell us that you want to shill viruses without telling us that you want to shill viruses.

Introduction

The main reason I write these posts is for everyone to see what these people do and who they are connected to and perhaps then it will become clear why they do what they do. We have written a detailed article on Mike’s undertakings from mid 2022 until the beginning of 2023. The article is titled: Mike Yeadon - Another Case of Lee Merritt?

Well, something interesting happened. Mike Yeadon came to try and defend himself in the comments underneath this article. Quite surprisingly, or not, he did not mention the contents of the article that was written by Omar Jordan that contain far more serious information about him than our article on the subject. We are focused more on the subject of No Virus but Omar had a much broader view on the issue. Be sure to check out Omar’s article here.

To get back to our first article on Mike Yeadon. The conversation took place in the comment section over the course of about a month and can be seen copied and pasted below. Before we get to that I’d like to highlight the fact that Mike Yeadon has recently (20 July 2023) gone on the Ask Dr Drew show to shill spike proteins and the dangers of them (note that he says in the comments below he likes to stick to something that he is 100% sure of). Please see the video here and take note of the date (for more information on spike proteins refer to the blog post by Michael McKay, here). This happened after our discussion a month earlier and when confronted about this he referred to someone else’s interview where it was mentioned that the No Virus position is not that important.

I think anyone in this movement knows that this is not the case. No Virus is perhaps the most important topic of our time. Without this lie there can be no more lockdowns, no more pandemics, no need for a digital ID (the reason he keeps on hammering on as something we should avoid at all cost), no need for ANY more vaccines, and no need for preventative medicines or synthetic supplements (something we have already shown as highly toxic but if you missed it you can review this article). A highlight from the poisonous synthetic vitamins article is a video by Agent131711 which can be viewed below (link to the video on bitchute here).

Loading video

What most fail to see is the massive market that has formed around preventative medicines and synthetic vitamins. This is not just for the profits on the products that are claimed to help you but also for the effects of the drugs and synthetic vitamins that is actually intended to make you sick and keep you in the pharma death machine. Once people get sick due to this utter rubbish (like Ivermectin, HCQ, synthetic vitamins and other petrochemical based poisons) they will seek the help of their local quack (medical doctor) and he will make sure that you receive “special” treatment.

Perhaps the sneakiest reason of all for preventative medicine is the effect of combining these poisons. Some substances inhibit the body’s ability to process poisons which assist in the absorption of other poisons. Please refer to Tim Truths articles discussing this here, here and here. For a brief explanation see the below quote from him:

We’ve discussed the role of P-glycoprotein in reducing ivermectin toxicity by limiting the toxic pesticide’s exposure to our brains and testes (among other vital tissues). In that article we also covered how ivermectin, hydroxychloriquine & some statins are P-glycoprotein inhibitors, which means they weaken the Pgp defenses against ivermectin at some very important tissues.

With Ivermectin known for its acutely toxic nature it is perhaps its attributes that inhibits the body’s ability to process poisons that does the most damage and probably one of the main reasons it is being pushed by the gatekeepers. With this information in mind we can highlight who is at the forefront of pushing Ivermectin. Mike Yeadon has featured in perhaps one of the best propaganda pieces on Ivermectin. The video was produced by the well known propagandist Mikki Willis and also features some of the top gatekeepers out there. It is important to take note of the team that was interviewed for this piece. This was not snippets taken from other appearances or interviews. This team was interviewed by Mikki Willis either in studio or at a site where Mikki was present or over zoom where the background could be adjusted to fit the scene for this piece. The ivermectin propaganda piece can be seen here.

The team that was interviewed to feature in this propaganda piece include Robert Malone, Pierre Kory, Richard Bartlett, Peter McCullough, and Mike Yeadon.

Just as a side note… Be sure to check out The Wellness Company’s (where Peter McCullough is the Chief Scientific Officer) Spike Support product to get back that pre-covid feeling (LMFAO).

---

Related articles discussing relevant topics:

• Kristen Welch (Moon Maiden Musings) - The Controversial DARPA Program that Facebook Seemingly Replaced

• Mike Stone (ViroLIEgy Newsletter) - The Snake Oil Tycoon

• Tim Truth - Over-The-Counter Drugs That Inhibit Important Defenses Called Pgp & CYP3A4 (also see here and here)

• Michael McKay (on the LewRockwell website) - mRNA “Vaccines” Causing Cells to Produce Spike Proteins is a Fairy Tale

---

Mike Yeadon’s Latest Interaction

Mike’s Comment - 10 June 2023

Dear DPL,

You wrote well & I read carefully from start to finish. In terms of objectively referencing what I’ve said, you’ve done an excellent job.

However, in interpreting underlying thinking and definitely in terms of motivations and intentions, you’ve been way too certain, when you cannot know either.

Your implied conclusion is that in some way, I’m on the side of the perpetrators of this appalling global crime.

All I can say to that, rather bitterly, is thanks a bunch. I’ve given freely of my time, indeed ALL of it, for well over three years, with no compensation sought or received, placing my life & certainly liberty at risk, in order to tell as many people as possible that THEY'RE BEING LIED TO,

The purpose of the lies is, ultimately, to seize totalitarian control over almost every human being and then to kill a substantial proportion of them. Absolutely horrifying. The realisation of the magnitude of what’s happening & the implications in terms of multigenerational planning cannot be described without using the word EVIL & the underlying motivation being satanic.

Now, quite early on, I realised that there was no new, disease-causing agent, no new illness & so no conceivable use in a vaccine.

Even if the official narrative was correct, there’s copious evidence confirming that creating a new material alleged to be a vaccine would be an ineffective approach & additionally, one which couldn’t possibly be completed in a time period relevant to the duration of a pandemic.

Here’s a really important thing for you to consider. I’ve spoken at length to at least half a dozen reasonably prominent truth tellers (those exposing official lies with a view to enslaving then killing large numbers of people). Without exception I’ve been unable to persuade a single one that “viruses do not exist”. I have little doubt you’ll be surprised at this, but that’s what I’ve found.

For myself, while I am ready to accept that no viruses exist, there’s a second really important point for you to appreciate. The failure to reasonably isolate & confirm the nature of infective substances called viruses is not unequivocal proof of non-existence. The old saw is helpful here, “Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence”. While it’s absurd to say “It’s possible somebody could properly isolate a virus tomorrow”, it’s literally true (albeit very, very unlikely).

Personally, I have determined empirically that even someone like me, 42 years since beginning training broadly in biological sciences, is unable to persuade a single, sympathetic person of the terminal problems with virology. Not one.

They mostly don’t want to believe it’s all been lies, and mostly they won’t read the carefully written articles by Sam or Mark Bailey, of by Tom Cowan or Andrew Kaufman (I clearly got bits of their names mixed up & I apologise for that).

I say again, with these clever people, with whom I’ve worked for up to three years, who know I’m reasonably bright and of good heart, I’ve been unable to persuade even one to do the leg work required to get to roughly where I am.

Now translate the setting to one in which most of the audience have been told I’m “a fraud, a grifter, an embittered former employee”. What would you reckon would be the chances that I would carry anyone with me if I start by saying “I no longer believe there are such things as respiratory illness-causing agents that are called viruses”. I know the answer. They immediately disbelieve anything else I might say.

That’s not my fault. It is however a reality we’ve no choice but to deal with.

I therefore years ago concluded that I would pick different lines of attack to expose the existence of fraud and then to show evidence of motive: to coerce billions to roll up their sleeves for an injection that’s “toxic by design”.

Failure to deal with this will lead to enslavement of all humanity using methods that once in place will be impossible to remove or escape from & I expect will be followed by radical global depopulation, using coerced, repeated injections of mRNA encoding non-self proteins. These will kill, if enough of a dose is administered sufficiently often, through fulminant autoimmune attack on one’s own tissues.

So I’ve stuck to my guns. It’s getting easier to demonstrable that there never was a pandemic. Furthermore, I have found people very receptive to the next item, that the countermeasures they were forced into doing, are all useless and indeed harmful, and that this was known to the perpetrators before they impose them.

It’s also a factual matter to show them the numerous meta analyses telling us that the injectable messes, termed flu vaccines, do not reduce hospitalization or death from flu-like illnesses.

In terms of the deliberately dangerous “covid19” “vaccines”, it’s paradoxically a big advantage that I never worked in a vaccines division. These complex biological entities are nothing like old school vaccines & so it would be no advantage to be a professional vaccinolpgist. Instead, being highly experienced in “rational drug design”, I can easily see intent in the basic design elements of these gene-based injections. When I explain to almost anyone, including those sceptical of the “no virus” narrative, they readily get it that they must, axiomatically, cause autoimmune attack on any tissue that takes up the injected material. If you express non-self proteins then, with very few exceptions, you’ll see autoimmune attack by the full night of your immune system.

The scientific method is very poor at proving negatives. All it can do is fail to find evidence of something. Eventually you reach a point where you’ll peel off and say to yourself “I don’t believe viruses exist”. That’s not a property of the scientific method. It’s really useful for many things, but proving negatives isn’t one of them. So that peeling off point isn’t scientific but a matter of faith. This is what makes it so hard to persuade someone psychologically wholly caught in Desmet’s “mass formation” to even consider matters such as we’re exchanging on here (the virus existential problem).

I’ve not found it helpful to swim in these waters. The audience, unless they’ve already made the intellectual as well as faith journeys themselves, just don’t & perhaps can’t follow an expose that begins with “I’ve come to the conclusion that respiratory viruses as a class do not exist”. The effect of me making such a claim, especially at the start of an interview, is that most of the audience now discounts pretty much everything else I tell them.

So I’ve mostly steered clear of the controversy. For pities sake, there’s so much low hanging fruit on other lies and evil intent.

Finally, there’s absolutely nothing in all this for me. I’m so grateful for the love, support and belief of my wife and young adult children. I have one sister who believes me. Everybody else in my own family call me a conspiracy theorist and I’m estranged from those in both Australia and in the USA. I’ve lost a lot of money in consulting fees foregone. I was fired by all my clients in summer 2020. My health isn’t the best & I am regrettably fairly sure that carrying this burden is substantially responsible for its worsening. I don’t stop, because there’s no where to run or hide.

As you pursue your appropriate passion, I ask that you evaluate the effectiveness of your own methods in persuading those who remain fooled by the lies. If I can learn somethings that help me, I’d very likely adopt them.

As for Liberty Places, I made a moderate sized gift to the founders. I never had any other involvement in it. I don’t even own a shake, because they burned through the money!

If, having read this, you still think I’m some kind of black hat wearing schemer, I’ll wish you good day.

All the best

Mike

Dr Mike Yeadon

Ps: it’s 3am & I’m too knackered to proof read this. Apologies for any typos.

DPL’s Comment - 11 June 2023

Dear Mike,

I read your response twice to figure out what you are trying to say. It seems that you are trying to say that you are still indecisive? Your words:

"For myself, while I am ready to accept that no viruses exist, there’s a second really important point for you to appreciate. The failure to reasonably isolate & confirm the nature of infective substances called viruses is not unequivocal proof of non-existence. The old saw is helpful here, “Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence”. " (Strange thing after seeing your signature on the Bailey Virus Challenge)

Something I tried to portray in this article is the simplicity of the issue. We can list the topics of interest as follows (in order of importance):

1 - The failure to prove transmission in over 120 years of published work

2 - The flawed isolation procedure that show failed controls since the first time of its so-called successful use

3 - The complete lack of proof that factors in vivo are the same as those experienced in vitro like CPE (words written by Enders himself)

I have gone to some length to explain the above three important points in this article - https://dpl003.substack.com/p/virology-the-damning-evidence

But the main aim with repeating and expanding on this subject again in this article on you is to highlight the simplicity of it. It took me a few weeks only to learn what they mean by cytopathic effect and the relevance of it (to learn the language). Something, I would guess, you are already familiar with having worked in the field for 42 years... We can actually stop at step one of the above points because there can be no infectious viral agent if we cannot prove transmission (no need to confuse anyone past that point).

Apart from the above, and forgive me because you have not made any conclusive statements so I must go on what I think you are saying, you are also of the opinion that even if it was the case that there really is no virus it would not really matter... This because you have found that people shut down because it's too much of a stretch? I can tell you from experience that this is not the case. We have had zoom rooms filled with doctors, scientists, lawyers, and many other people in different fields. We have had debate on the subject, and we have explained the issue very simply and a lot of them have been convinced. In fact, we've even interviewed a microbiologist still working in the field who have completely woken up to the lie.

Also, Andy, Cowan and others have massive followings and I have seen more and more people call out others that are refusing to even talk about the fact that there is no virus. I am not sure why you have taken this angle of tiptoeing around the main issue.

One thing that I have been seeing going around, even though I have not seen it directly from you, is people saying that the no virus topic is not important, but we rather need to oppose the lockdown measures or technocracy (it probably ties in well with your claim that there is no Novel Virus). Even your claim that there are so many other low hanging fruit. I cannot begin to understand the reasoning. We have been in this cycle of them selling us lies for centuries. This will not change if we do not take a firm stance to only bring out the truth. In a few years it will all be forgotten, and we will sink back into the same hole we were in.

I constantly struggle to win the debate in my head why anyone would not come out with the truth on this and tell the message in a simple way in order to make people see. My conclusion will not change because there are just too many coincidences to be comfortable with… You have again proven my article on you correct by not making any conclusive statement except maybe if we consider your claim of making a donation to Liberty Places.

For me the main issue is the whole of Virology and the germ theory concept that has led to devastation of health, not only in the last three years, but over the last 100 years. The concept that you can immunize against a virus is what most of this is based on. Vaccination cannot be better described than the words of Dr Walter Hadwen (someone that lived almost a century ago now):

“As a medical man I look upon vaccination as an insult to common sense, as superstitious in its origin, unscientific in theory and practice, and useless and dangerous in its character.”

It is my opinion that this will never stop if we do not take a firm stance, and this is easy to see if you dig back in history. Every 30 years or so there seem to be some sort of “viral” outbreak. Spanish flu in 1920, Poilo (or rather DDT) in 1950, HIV outbreak in 1980 and now the big one the covid hoax. You are speaking out against Covid but saying nothing about all the others… Do you think people will not find this strange?

I am always open to talk about this and willing to apologize about my conclusions about you but then at least give me something or show how serious you are about getting the truth out because you and I both know how important this is to people’s health. There are still millions out there making use of petrochemical based poisons the worst of which is useless vaccines, and I do mean all vaccines, for a virus the does not exist.

Thank you for taking the time to comment here. I would love to hear more from you if you are up to it.

dpl

Mike’s Comment - 11 June 2023

Honestly, I feel so utterly exhausted that I’m uninclined to join the debate.

I replied only because you said “in a few years it’ll all be forgotten….and they will do it again” (something along those lines).

No. In a few months to a couple of years, we’ll be under irretrievable digital totalitarian control. From that position, they’ll execute most people.

I doubt any position I take will make a blind bit of difference.

I’ve given over a hundred interviews telling people that mRNA “vaccines” are designed to kill them. That requires them to do nothing except choose to believe me. I’m highly qualified to arrive at this view.

And you know what, they still get injected.

DPL’s Comment - 11 June 2023

I am just as exhausted Mike... My work over the last 3 years was, I'd argue, much harder than yours to arrive at the truth because I did not know about any of this when I started, not even the terminology that you are familiar with (or the connections to have a call with Cowan). What wasted even more of my time and also got me unbelievably mad (mad enough to start the GatekeeperClub) was the fact that I got drawn in by Judy Mikovits. She also encourage against the Covid shot but still support the virus model. Was it not for others that opened my eyes to this fallacy I would have vaccinated my children that was born over this period not knowing that there is a deeper truth that actually disproves the use of any vaccines. Do you see the picture... If I did vaccinate my children because I had no better information than that of Judy Mikovits what use was her information to me?

I have also done a lot of interviews, same as you, I have been involved with public events, community building and endless late night zooms for weeks on end. For me that is no problem. I am not looking for any sympathy for going through this because I've had a great opportunity to learn things that most will have to spend years to puzzle out.

You make the claim: "No. In a few months to a couple of years, we’ll be under irretrievable digital totalitarian control. From that position, they’ll execute most people."

How could you possibly know this? We know that it is what they are aiming for but there is no way that you could know what the timeline is and still with so little proof you make this claim. This has been their goal for close to a century if you consider the work of Orwell... It will, in my opinion, definitely not happen in the next few year.

But all the above is irrelevant if you think that your voice makes no difference. Why then say anything at all? I am just perplexed that you would have this attitude of defeat and would not be out to tell people the entirety of the truth. Don't you want to be remembered as someone that stood for truth and if you don't see it (the fact that there is no virus) what is it you are having difficulty with?

Mike’s Comment - 12 June 2023

I’ve stated there are no respiratory viruses. I can & do back it up. The frequently asked follow up questions I can generally field ok.

However, I don’t have much more than an intelligent layperson’s understanding of “viral” diseases, say, of the liver.

So what I mean is I have significant residual uncertainty about viruses in such contexts.

I’m aware there are gaps in virology that look like fraud to me.

A scientist who leaps into such a contentious area with virtually no relevant expertise forfeits any hope that people will pay particular attention to anything they say.

I read this short article, for example. I know the work of Tom Jefferson and Carl Heneghan generally to be careful.

What should we make of his claim that measles incidence rises when vaccination rate falls?

Is this claim factually wrong?

If not, how are injections and measles linked? They shouldn’t be, if there’s no viruses, surely?

Not being difficult on purpose.

As for the intention to kill, I’m much more sure than I am about viruses.

I spent over 30 years in what’s called “rational drug design”. To achieve certain properties in a molecule there are lots of useful methods. While far from exhaustive, I can deduce intent from design choices.

Looking at the “vaccines”, I can see at least three major mechanisms of toxicity designed into them. I was sure enough to be a coauthor on the only detailed scientific critique of c19 injections published before any of them obtained EUA.

The data on suffering and death was truly shocking even as we expected it.

None of these built in features could possibly be argued to be inadvertent.

The mechanisms of toxicity are well known to those who work in drug design.

Additionally, these injections couldn’t possibly help anyone. And they didn’t. They’ve just lied about it.

Now we are told of factories going up to manufacture billions more doses of mRNA “vaccines” which, unless they’re lying, or they’re planning on pouring them away, are going to be injected into people. This will kill them, given enough injections.

Prior to that, we can I think all see the control grid being dropped into place.

Digital ID & cashless CBDC is enough if we sign up for the former.

My focus is on warning about this imminent digital prison & especially pleading with people not to sign up for digital ID.

The EU & WEF announced in the last few days a partnership on digital ID.

Mississippi announced its “Mobile ID” recently. Everything can be uploaded to it.

The US Federal Reserve is currently running a three month trial of CBDC.

It would take excessive optimism to think we’ve very much more time.

I started with an expectation that thousands of scientists would join me in condemning official behaviour.

They didn’t.

As you’ve discovered there are tight limits to what an individual can accomplish because censorship is really bad.

Good luck!

Mike

Link the Mike provided here

DPL’s Comment - 12 June 2023

Everything you explain have one central fraud and that is the lie that an infectious virus can spread around and make people sick. You talk of a measles case increase with a decrease of measles vaccine injections but the first question, in my mind, and in any logical person's mind, especially a scientist would be: They claim measles is infectious and can be transmitted but has transmission of a viral agent been proven?

This very simply assumption of transmission therefore has to be proven but over the course of 120 years this has not happened yet. Right there and then everything you assume about an infectious viral agent is out the window. The evidence for this is follow:

- I have detailed most of the published peer reviewed studies on this in an article here - https://dpl003.substack.com/p/virology-the-damning-evidence

- Cowan and Jon explain that over the course of their combined ~50 years of searching they have been unable to find it here - https://www.bitchute.com/video/hnzYUMEKfXh2/

- The Perth group has shown without a shadow of a doubt that there is no infectious agent other then normal cellular vesicles in the cultures. Video explanation and papers in the video description here - https://www.bitchute.com/video/nbDqSwTkPx4m/

- Stefan Lanka has further proven this in his court case where he won against the claim that there is a measles virus in the supreme court of Germany

Nothing else matters... Not the isolation procedure or the failed controls indicating you are dealing with cellular vesicles or the flawed genome sequencing procedure or even statistical studies that can be bent to the will of the author. Nothing. For if you cannot show that what you are dealing with is transmittable your most fundamental assumption is flawed. No scientist can move past this point whilst being honest with himself.

I take note of your attempt to hint toward my lack of credentials and to that I make the following statement. Stefan Lanka and a group of scientists with the relevant scientific background that call themselves the Perth group has taught me most of this and instead of making assumptions that they are correct or trustworthy I printed out the papers they were referring to, went over them enough times to understand the terminology and came to the conclusion that they were telling the truth.

Where have have you been over the last three years Mike? You had a jump start on me when it comes to this information. Whilst I was drawn in by the likes of Judy Mikovits you were talking to Cowan and Kaufman...

I do agree that there are limits to what we can accomplish. In my opinion this is dictated by the limitations we put on ourselves. I like to believe that the people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world are the ones who do.

Mike’s Comment - 14 June 2023

Thank you, I’m fully on board and will say so.

My hunch is it will reduce my effectiveness.

But it is what it is.

DPL’s Comment - 14 June 2023

It would most definitely not reduce your effectiveness as you will pick up a lot of support from all the people carrying this truth. If ever you need assistance you can message me any time but I'm sure Cowan would take your call in a heartbeat. Nothing would make him happier than to have a voice like yours teaching people that transmission has never been proven and that the isolation procedure is fraudulent because it means the opposite of isolation (with failed control tests and no proof that what had been "isolated" can cause disease).

Hope you have a great rest of the day Mike and thank you for taking the time to comment here.

Mike’s Comment - 14 June 2023

Thank you, too. I’m comfortable getting behind all those messages.

DPL’s Comment - 20 July 2023

Hi Mike,

I watched your recent interview with Stew Peters and find your message difficult to digest based on what we have discussed in these comments. You spoke at length about the spike protein which is puzzling seeing as you know that there is no virus and the fact that virology theorizes that a spike protein is a protrusion from a virus (the one cannot exist without the other). You do mention for a brief few seconds that you have doubt in the model of virology which I'd like to believe that you are hinting towards the topic of our discussion here but then I stand back and look at your appearances on all these different platforms and I cannot help but wonder how you end up with interviewers that only ever push the virus narrative. Whether that be a derivative of it (spike protein) or the virus topic itself I have never seen you on a platform that discuss the no virus position. My initial thought was that these people are perhaps the only people that has offered you an opportunity and I'd like to, as you say, always believe the good in people so I'll stick with this assumption for now. I would therefore like to offer you the opportunity to speak on the topic of no virus with interviewers that know the topic fairly well. It would surely go a long way to see you have a balance in coverage of these topics because at the moment it is pretty one sided.

If you would be open to it, we could interview you or we could get someone else that's also good with interviews like Luther, Alec Zeck, Kristen Welch from The Starfire Codes, Tim Truth or many other channels that will be more than happy to interview you.

Do let me know if this will interest you.

DPL’s Comment - 22 July 2023

Hi Mike,

Just to clarify my last comments. We are willing to interview you on the no virus topic any time you want. Please let me know if you are interested.

Regards

dpl

He Mike

You say you'd like to keep to topics you are 100% sure of. Please can you explain how you are 100% sure of the spike protein if you've admitted that there is no virus. This is supposed to be a protrusion from a virus...

Not really getting the logic here.

Mike’s Comment - 22 July 2023

If you watch my interview with Dr Drew & Dr Victory, my judgement is that it’s so jarring to even attempt to broach the topic, while we’re “under live fire” that’s it’s more likely to damage my ability to communicate things I’m 100% sure of.

The existential question is not a straightforward as is being suggested. We cannot expect those who’ve spent a lifetime with one model of the world will move in response to a few sentences from a non expert on the topic.

I’ve continued to try with people I know well as in the main, they still resist!

Got to pick battles imo.

All the best

Mike

Mike’s Comment - 27 July 2023

https://delingpole.podbean.com/e/feargus-o-connor-greenwood/

The first 13-14minutes captures my stance,

Thanks,

Mike

---

Also consider joining the following groups: