110 Comments
Aug 13Liked by dpl

Excellent! The 'NO VIRUS' stance is the best and only one. It totally dismantles vaccines and everything that surrounds it.

Expand full comment
Aug 13Liked by dpl

Many are moved to comment "I dont know if viruses exist or not." Equivocation is understandable - but their doubt is The Enemy's Fifth Column. Eqivocators will grudgingly accept The Next Pandemic...

Give *The Virus* an inch, and it will take a foot...

Expand full comment

No virus. No science. No vaccines. No WHO. No CDC. No WEF. No pandemic. No shit. Any questions?

Expand full comment
Aug 13Liked by dpl

Thank you for publishing all of this as well your pursuit to uncover the “half-truthers” and their deliberate deceptions.

Your analysis has become invaluable as far as I’m concerned.

It has helped me confirm my suspicions.

I also had an interaction with Mike Yeadon right at the beginning of scamdemic via telegram and was fooled (like so many others) into believing he was selflessly exposing the lies. I even reached out to him to help with a pivotal (proving that that the Gov. had no right to make jabs mandatory for workers) case being brought before the courts in my country.

He suddenly had no time to spare but wishing everyone the best of luck.

I’ve since come to the realisation that the whole court case was a sham that was staged by a lawyer who had no intention of winning but to appear like they also were on the side of “truth and freedom”.

There are so many games being played it makes your head spin at times.

The question I often ask myself is “why” do they do this when they must know they are deliberately deceiving everyone and helping to ensure future generations remain deceived?

Expand full comment
Aug 13·edited Aug 13Liked by dpl

Most likely the reason is far more simple as why they are pushing Ivermectin and why it now has been oked , simply to keep the virus story going. There is loads of more monies to be made in the future and many people have to keep buying into this 'virus will kill you ' narrative over and over again. Now they have succeeded by the likes of Yeadon , Mikki Mouse and whatever these people are called to keep this large group into believing a Covid virus was killing people and that it was big bad Pharma Gates and his kill shot who killed more people and if only they would have had Ivermectin , all these people would have survived . Very clever move to keep the money train going. Not very bright of these Ivermectin believers , do they not know the all 3rd world countries have it in all pharmacies for dirt cheap . Are they now going to say, ah that's why not so many died there ? and come up with some bogus statistics again to prove it? . So DPL it is just like fishing , the net was laid out and is reeling in the Ivermectin believers now , with other words , 'they still believe a virus can kill you . Job done for the next virus con. Brought to you by Yeadon, Mikki Mouse and whatever they are all called.

Expand full comment

Viruses DON'T exist:

1. Mortality rates for 2020 were normal overall for the year (below average in many countries)

2. The only measurable health crisis in 2020 was caused by Midazolam, DNRs, Ventilators, neglect, lockdowns etc.

3. We only saw significant excess deaths/ injuries/ sickness after the vax rollout, a trend which even followed the various age groups being vaxxed.

Viruses DO exist:

1. Mortality rates for 2020 were normal overall for the year (below average in many countries)

2. The only measurable health crisis in 2020 was caused by Midazolam, DNRs, Ventilators, neglect, lockdowns etc.

3. We only saw significant excess deaths/ injuries/ sickness after the vax rollout, a trend which even followed the various age groups being vaxxed.

If viruses do exist we must acknowledge they exhibit all the characteristics of not existing, such as not causing enough sickness or death to even be measurable, even during the worst viral pandemic in history.

The CLAIM that viruses don't exist can always be countered. It sets up a tug of war which will always INVITE an opposing reaction.

However, the OBSERVATION that viruses are tiny sub microscopic nothing burgers cannot be countered. You're not even disagreeing with virologists, you're just helping them to properly define their virions based on real world observations.

If I was a virologist I would not care about people claiming viruses don't exist. But I would find it incredibly annoying if people HELPED me to define viruses as nothing burgers, based on real world observations on the human scale..... observations that supersede all the abstract and convoluted data from my fancy pants lab equipment.

It seems odd to argue that viruses don't exist when they can even be extracted from a sample of pure yeast. The truth is viruses exist wherever we look for them. Again, this is just another (more fun) way of pointing out that they do not exist at all.

By arguing that viruses don't exist we can't celebrate the fact that virology equipment is so amazing it can find viruses in anything! ...... just as paranoid schizophrenics can find telepathic alien technology in cottage cheese, wallpaper and next door's Labrador.

Expand full comment
Aug 13Liked by dpl

Excellent! The 'NO VIRUS' stance is the best and only one. It totally dismantles vaccines and everything that surrounds it.

Expand full comment

I think the problem with the 'you cannot prove a negative' argument is that you can. Science and the law do it all the time. It's what they're for. A man is accused, if there's no evidence he's innocent of the crime, which was done by someone else, in the eyes of the law, beyond all reasonable doubt he is innocent of that crime.

The scientific method is constantly supposed to disprove itself. So a crime/disease happens. A person or an entity is accused of causing it. The person is identified by witnesses and a birth certificate. The accused entity has no witnesses and cannot be identified without using a circular argument; a few genetic sequences present at the scene of the crime cannot prove that they both caused the crime and come from the entity. If DNA was present at a crime it would not be assumed that it belonged to the accused until the accused's DNA was checked. The entity's DNA and identity can't be checked as the few genetic sequences are all that indicate its existence.

The issue is not that one cannot prove a negative. It is that the rule of law and the scientific method, has been completely abandoned in favour of press conferences and kangaroo courts.

Expand full comment
Aug 13·edited Aug 13Liked by dpl

I no longer subscribe to viruses and I've seen countless comments on YouTube, Bit Chute, Rumble, and Odysee who've made these very comments. I'm now on board with the Terrain Theory. I still believe bacterial and fungal infections exist since I can see them myself. I think the whole viral scam was to convince us to inject poisons into us which would make us sick afterwards or in the long run. Perhaps, they even had covid in mind when they started this long ago. This has been a generational plan. I've had to take vaccines when I was in the military supporting banker's wars. Hindsight is 20/20. I was not fortunate enough to learn this earlier and my children took vaccines. I did learn the truth about them right around the time they were to get the 2 rounds of vaccines. I didn't want them to take any and the wife and I really got into it over this one. I said if that's what you want, you do it but if something happens to them, it's all on you. She took them. She held on tight to this position because she's a science teacher. Well, when the whole covid/5g broke out, she started seeing what I was saying. I didn't have to say a word. I think she now regrets it but I don't bring it up. None of us took the kill shot. And if anyone tries to force it on me, I will have no choice but to defend myself. If I die, it's not going to be from a damn vaccine.

DPL, I'm fairly new to you Substack and I'm curious as to what your take is on Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD and Dr. David Nixon regarding what they say they're seeing in the jabbed and unjabbed? Also, what are your thoughts on them along with a few others stating they are seeing anomalies in the injectables like lidocaine, insulin, and others? Lastly, the one that boggles my mind is those who say the jabbed are emitting a Bluetooth BLE signal. I did work as an IT Network Engineer for almost 2 decades and I've been doing scans and I'm picking up tons up BT MAC Address while out. It allows me to see the RSSI signal so I can get a good idea how far away one is. For instance, I picked up nearly 400 in a grocery store with maybe 100 people in there and there's no way that many people had that many BT devices. These come up unknown unknown and I'm not able to lookup the manufacturer in the MAC address database. Now, there are legit ones for phones, watches, headphones, etc. but 95% are of unknown origin. Have you given any thought to this and their claims? You may have already addressed in another article but I haven't looked for it.

Edit: I forgot to mention I actually know someone who didn't take the jab but they are able to stick a spoon to their chest. We are clueless about this unless they really are placeing Graphen Oxide GO in our food and drinks.

Thanks for getting this out there because if we are still around, my children will not be jabbing their children since they are aware of a lot of this now.

Expand full comment
Aug 25Liked by dpl

Hi dpl - new subscriber here. I would be interested in your evaluation of Sasha Latypova, maybe in a future article? She has recently become very snappy with any commenter from the NoVirus camp, as well as anyone who brings up possibility of GO being in the shots, and also avoids discussing nanotechnology, even though she was one of the first to interview Shimon Yanowitz on the subject. Since her interview with Dr Hassan (the poop lady), she avoids discussing the no virus issue. She also banned Christine Massey a couple of months back and deleted all her comments, after a nasty attack and humiliating attack on her which seemed to me to be totally unjustified. Any thoughts on this person? I'm a paid subscriber to her substack at present so was quite shocked and disappointed.

Expand full comment

I don't understand why everyone is still arguing about the existence of viruses.

Surely, by now, you realise that we are made ill by another factor?

We knew it was b/s back in 2020! We talked about it openly and were deplatformed for our trouble.

We KNEW it was 5G that had triggered illness. Dean Henderson, Ramola D and I talked about it candidly in this conversation which covers the foundations of this totalitarian empire, who is involved now and where this is headed.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/e5VwQz4Kq73j/

Expand full comment

This article is silly. Doesn't matter if viruses are real or not. We know the vaxxxes cause death and damage. This post seems designed to create discord in the health freedom movement.

Expand full comment

You are all talking to yourselves.

Good luck.

You’re going to need it.

Try telling injured & the bereaved there’s no virus.

I find “you’ve been poisoned deliberately” a better explanation.

Then “you’ve been lied to. About everything”

Run your own campaign. Leave me to mine. I’ll never do what I’m told to. That’s why I’m speaking out.

Expand full comment

I’m one of the few people saying there never was a virus.

No pandemic.

GFY.

Expand full comment